home of the wildlife conservation environmental
and freedom activist

Environment Action
Alerts for November 8 - November 15, 2001
 
Support Senate Proposal to Help
Farmers Help the Environment
Support Renewable Energy EarthNet News Nov 8

Population and Environment
Program Action Alert
NRDC Legislative
Watch, 11/8/01
Victory! Mexican
Prisoners Released

Support Senator Leahy &
Reid's Farm Bill Proposal
Overuse Threatens Antibiotics
Cipro and Baytril(R)
Articles re: Release
of Mexican Prisoners

Fundamental Environmental
Protections Jeopardized
UCS UPDATE: Support
Renewable Energy
Greenpeace Positive Energy:
Victory in San Francisco!

US Government's $2.5 Million
Mexican Biopiracy Project Cancelled
Greenpeace WTO
Update Number 1
Greenpeace WTO
Update Number 2

Landmark Victory with Dutch
Banks! Nov 7th round up
Eco Actions of
National Importance!
Staples Call-in Day
Nov 13, 2001

Urgent: Another Arctic
Refuge Threat
Mining Threatens Globally
Outstanding Ecoregion
AOC Action Network
Update

Help Stop Logging on
Umpqua National Forest
DenLines Nov 14 Success! Plans for
Amazon Pipeline Cracked

Town Hall Meetings on
Population and Environment
EarthNet News
November 15
Congress Must Assert
Its Oversight Authority!



from Environmental Defense November 8, 2001

Take action to support Senator Leahy and Reid's Farm
Bill proposal, which will boost federal funds to help
farmers help the environment.

You can take action on this alert either via email
(please see directions below) or via the web at:
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/farm_reform_senate2/wk8bxn2o78xbi5

Spread the word about helping farmers help the environment.
Visit the web address below and tell your friends to
take action on this important campaign!
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/farm_reform_senate2/forward/wk8bxn2o78xbi5

We encourage you to take action by December 7, 2001

Helping Farmers Help the Environment! ONTO THE SENATE

----------------------

Take action to support Senator Leahy and Reid's Farm
Bill proposal, which will boost federal funds to help
farmers help the environment.

----------------------

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA THE WEB:
If you have access to a web browser, you can take action
on this alert by going to the following URL:

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/farm_reform_senate2/wk8bxn2o78xbi5  

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA EMAIL:
Just choose the "reply to sender" option on your email
program, and edit the letter below as you wish. Do
not delete "-YOU MAY EDIT THE LETTER BELOW-" and "-END
OF LETTER-". Please do not add your name and address
to your letter. Our system automatically does this
for you.  

We STRONGLY encourage you to make edits directly to
our sample letter below, and put the alert talking
points into your own words. An individualized letter
is worth ten computer generated letters. Of course,
hundreds of unedited letters will still create a large
impact, so please reply even if you don't have time
to personalize the letter.

Your letter will be addressed and sent to:
Senator Hillary Clinton


-------YOU MAY EDIT THE LETTER BELOW---------

Please co-sponsor Senators Leahy and Reid's Farm Bill
proposal. Their proposal would make conservation and
environmental protection central to the Farm Bill,
would ensure more states and farmers get their fair
share of federal agriculture help, and would avoid
violating important world trade agreements.  

There is growing national support for major reform
of federal agricultural programs from President Bush,
200 members of the House of Representatives, and others.
Refocusing farm subsidies on conservation would provide
benefits to many more farmers across the nation, not
just the largest corporate farms, and would make better
use of taxpayer dollars. This effort was closely defeated
in the House, so your leadership to ensure a conservation-oriented,
regionally equitable Senate Farm Bill is critical.

Today, most farmers, ranchers and private forest landowners
seeking federal help to clean up water, combat sprawl
or help wildlife are rejected due to inadequate funding.
For example, three in four farmers and ranchers seeking
financial assistance to clean water are rejected.

The Leahy-Reid Farm Bill would provide new funds to
protect farmland and open space from sprawl, restore
wildlife habitat, encourage organic farming, restore
wetlands, and more. Unless we reward farmers when they
meet our environmental challenges, one third of rivers
and lakes will remain polluted, hundreds of species
will creep closer to extinction, and millions of acre
of open space will be lost.  

Please co-sponsor the Leahy-Reid Farm Bill to ensure
that the next Farm Bill helps protect our natural resources,
public health, and agricultural communities.

-------END OF LETTER-------------------------


from  Union of Concerned Scientists November 8, 2001

*************************UCS ACTION ALERT*************************

Contact your Senators TODAY and urge them to sign the Renewable
Energy Letter being circulated  by Senators Reid (D-NV) and Cantwell (D-WA).

ISSUE:
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD) recently directed committee chairs to forward recommendations to him for a comprehensive national energy bill to be ready to introduce on the Senate floor this year.

The "Dear Colleague" letter that Senators Reid and Cantwell are circulating urges Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD) to include a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) and a Production Tax Credit (PTC) in the comprehensive energy package. The RPS requires that a minimum percentage of electricity come from renewable energy sources like wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass. The PTC would provide renewable energy developers with the economic support they need to become competitive with other, dirtier and heavily subsidized forms of energy such as coal, oil and nuclear.

ACTION:
Call or email your Senators and urge them to sign on to the letter TODAY. The deadline for sign ons is noon tomorrow - Friday, Nov. 9, 2001.

To contact your Senators:
- By telephone, call the Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121
- Obtain e-mail and fax information by visiting the Senate web site (www.senate.gov)

MESSAGE:
Tell your Senators that increasing production of renewable energy - such as wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass - is important to provide safe, clean, and affordable power for Americans.  Senators Reid and Cantwell are circulating a letter asking Senator Daschle to include a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) and a Production Tax Credit (PTC) for renewable energy into the comprehensive energy package.  An RPS would require that utilities provide some percentage of their electricity from renewable power sources by a certain year. Analysis by the Union of Concerned Scientists (Clean Energy Blueprint available at www.ucsusa.org/energy/blueprint.html) shows that a 20 percent RPS by 2020, when combined with the PTC and additional policies to improve energy efficiency, can save consumers money, improve our environment, and over time reduce risks to national security.

The sign on letter does not endorse any particular percentage or year for the RPS, nor does it ask Senators to endorse any particular number or year. A PTC would provide renewable energy with the economic support they need to become competitive with other, dirtier and heavily subsidized forms of energy such as coal, oil and nuclear.


FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Please contact Jeff Deyette (jdeyette@ucsusa.org) or visit the UCS Clean Energy Program web site at www.ucsusa.org/energy


from EarthNet News November 8, 2001

EarthNet News
..a project of the Center for Environmental Citizenship

November 8, 2001  
-------------------------------------------------------
This week in EarthNet, help the Quechan protect their
sacred lands from mining interests and cheer for an
environmental whistleblower's success.  

--Susie Gorden, EarthNet Editor
mailto:earthnet@envirocitizen.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Shadow Congress: Is Nothing Sacred?  
2. Quote of the Week
3. Letter to the Editor  
4. Glimmer of Hope
5. Eco-Exposure
6. Jobs, Conferences and Gatherings
7. Activist Phone Book & EarthNet News Info

SHADOW CONGRESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Quechan people have been practicing religious ceremonies
on Indian Pass in the California desert for thousands
of years. Now Glamis Imperial Corporation wants to
dig open gold pits and set up roads on land that the
Quechan people believe is sacred.  

Buckling under the pressure of a lawsuit, Interior
Secretary Gale Norton is rolling back provisions to
prohibit mining on protected lands -- a move that sounds
the death knell for lands that previously enjoyed protection.
Issued last Thursday, the Interior Department's weakened
mining regulations have cleared the way for Glamis
International to set up a cyanide heap leach gold mine
on Indian Pass in southern California. This was prevented
from happening under the Clinton administration, which
recognized the importance of keeping Indian Pass out
of the hands of mining companies and protecting cultural
resources. The about-turn will have serious impacts
on the Quechan people who have used and revered this
land for thousands of years and have already fought
-- and theoretically won -- the battle to defend the
Pass. Tell the Interior Department to respect our environment
and the religious freedom of all Americans.

TAKE ACTION NOW: Use the EarthNet Action Center to
urge the Interior Department to reconsider weakening
mining regulations as they continue their review at
http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet

FOR MORE INFO: http://www.sacredland.org/indian_pass.html;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A53812-2001Oct25.html;
http://earthrunner.com/4winds/glamis2.html;
http://www.blm.gov/nhp/news/releases/pages/2001/pr011025_3809.htm
http://www.cs.org/publications/CSQ/251.htm

QUOTE OF THE WEEK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

The good Lord didn't see fit to put oil and gas only
where there are democratic regimes friendly to the
United States.
-- Current US vice president Dick Cheney, in speaking
to the Cato Institute three years ago

LETTER(s) TO THE EDITOR
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to last week's Corporate Corner action
alert:

Instead of urging Bayer to stop using Baytril, an antibiotic,
in poultry farming, a more effective and safer approach
would be to stop eating chicken.  

People who choose to eat chicken are facing several
dangers in regards to their health and the much more
sensible move would be to exclude chicken from their
diet. Today, this is not such an extreme move since
there are plenty of alternatives to meat and poultry
products. So, let's join together and really send Bayer
a message by not purchasing any chicken!
--Marissa Amoni, Tucson, AZ  

Got something to say? Send your letters to mailto:earthnet@envirocitizen.org
We reserve the right to edit for length, clarity, and
purpose.

GLIMMER OF HOPE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
An environmental whistleblower in Colorado received
one of the largest settlements since the law protecting
such activities went on the books three decades ago.
In a September ruling, the judge assigned to the case
ruled that activist Adrienne Anderson is entitled to
$425,000 in compensatory and punitive damages. As
a Denver representative on the board of the Metro Wastewater
Reclamation District, she filed a complaint with the
U.S. Department of Labor claiming her employer had
retaliated against her for engaging in protected activities,
such as her work in alerting the public to dangers
from a local landfill. To read more about the case,
go to http://www.westword.com/issues/2001-11-01/news2.html/1/index.html

ECO-EXPOSURE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have you contributed substantially to your campus community?
If so, you might be eligible for a $10,000 grant to
further your or your organization's goals. Check out
http://www.doublemint.com/applygrant.asp for more info.
Campus organizations, as well as individuals enrolled
at a two- or four-year college, are eligible.  

JOBS AND INTERNSHIPS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are a sampling of the over 200 environmental
and activist jobs and internships listed at www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/index.asp

The National Wildlife Federation is hiring a Managing
Editor for their website KidZone in Reston, VA. Find
the job description at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/detail.asp?id=3619

Pew Wilderness Center is looking for a Research Assistant
Intern in Seattle, WA. Find the job description at
http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/detail.asp?id=3616

Public Interest Research Groups (PIRGs) seek a Safe
Foods Corporate Advocate in Los Angeles, CA. Find the
job description at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/detail.asp?id=3599

CONFERENCES, GATHERINGS AND VIEWINGS  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lots more events listed at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/index.asp

WHAT: National Forest Protection Alliance Conference
WHERE: Cedar Mountain, NC
WHEN: November11-14, 2001
FOR MORE INFO: http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/detail.asp?id=902

WHAT: 2001 Session of the Chicagoland Peoples Assembly
WHERE: Chicago, IL
WHEN: November 10, 2001
FOR MORE INFO: http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/detail.asp?id=974

WHAT: Wild Arts Festival
WHERE: Portland, OR
WHEN: November 23-25, 2001
FOR MORE INFO: http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/detail.asp?id=939


ACTIVIST PHONE BOOK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Capitol Switchboard: 202.224.3121
White House Comment Line: 202.456.1111
EarthNet Action Center: http://congress.nw.dc.us/cec

White House Address: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington,
DC 20500
Senate Address: US Senate, Washington, DC 20510
House Address: US House of Representatives, Washington,
DC 20515
**Look up e-mail addresses in a comprehensive congressional
directory at
http://congress.nw.dc.us/cec/congdir.html or http://www.vote-smart.org/ce

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write your own short articles for submission to EarthNet.
We are particularly interested in articles about student
activism on your campus. The email accounts for EarthNet
News are:
For general comments: mailto:earthnet@envirocitizen.org
Submit Jobs/Internships/Volunteer listings at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/add.asp .
Submit Events at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/add.asp.


from National Wildlife November 8, 2001

The Senate version of H.R. 2506, the FY 2002 Foreign Operations Appropriations Bill includes higher levels of funding for reproductive health and family planning services than the House version of the bill. Additionally, the Senate version includes Senator Boxer's (D-CA) provision to remove the global gag rule. The President has issued a veto threat for the Foreign Operations Appropriations Bill if Senator Boxer's language trying to negate the global gag rule remains in the bill.

Next week, the House-Senate Foreign Operation Appropriations Conference Committee will meet to work out all the differences between the two bills and come out with one bill which will be sent to the President.

YOUR HELP IS NEEDED NOW!

Although your Senators or Representative are not on the conference committee you can contact them and urge them to tell their colleagues on the committee to support the senate version of the bill.

Tell them that:
· International family planning saves people's lives and protects the planet.

· Please support the Senate version of H.R. 2506, the 2002 Foreign Operations Appropriations bill which includes:  higher funding levels - the senate version includes $450 million for USAID and $40 million for UNFPA and protective language - the senate version includes language which would remove the global gag rule and allow foreign governments and NGO's the discretion to use their non-U.S. money in the best interest of their people in accordance with their own laws.

· One way to help keep Americans safe and America strong is to fund positive international assistance programs that improve the social and economic well-being of the world's most vulnerable. International family planning funding is a critical component of that assistance and helps to save the lives of women and children around the world and works to move us toward a more sustainable future.

Please keep in mind that Congress is dealing with many problems right now and it is somewhat complicated to contact them and their responses may not be as timely as usual due to these difficulties. I recommend contacting your representative and senators through email, fax, or phone. You can reach them by calling the U.S. Capitol switchboard at 202-224-3121. You may also direct your comments to their district office. Additionally, feel free to use this time to also thank them for their leadership during this difficult time.

For more information please contact us at population@nwf.org or 202-797-6800.

Following is the list of members on the Conference Committee.

House
Representative Roger F. Wicker (R-MS-1)
Representative Jesse L. Jackson (D-IL-2)
Representative John E. Sununu (R-NH-1)
Representative Jack Kingston (R-GA-1)
Representative Steven R. Rothman (D-NJ-9)
Representative Carolyn C. Kilpatrick (D-MI-15)
Representative Jerry Lewis (R-CA-40)
Representative Jim Kolbe (R-AZ-5)
Representative David R. Obey (D-WI-7)
Representative Nita M. Lowey (D-NY-18)
Representative Joe Knollenber (R-MI-11)
Representative Sonny Callahan (R-AL-1)
Representative C. W. Young (R-FL-10)
Representative Nancy Pelosi (D-CA-8)
Representative Henry Bonilla (R-TX-23)

Senate
Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-IL)
Senator Robert F. Bennett (R-UT)
Senator Richard C. Shelby (R-AL)
Senator Robert C. Byrd (D-WV)
Senator John F. Reed (D-RI)
Senator Tim P. Johnson (D-SD)
Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK)
Senator Barbara A. Mikulski (D-MD)
Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA)
Senator Daniel K. Inouye (D-HI)
Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA)
Senator Christopher Bond (R-MO)
Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R-CO)
Senator Judd Gregg (R-NH)
Senator Patrick J. Leahy (D-VT)


from Natural Resources Defense Council November 8, 2001

Natural Resources Defense Council's

LEGISLATIVE WATCH

November 8, 2001

******************************
Please do not reply to this message. See the instructions below for
how to unsubscribe or contact NRDC with questions or comments.
******************************

Contents:

1) Legislative Watch
2) About Our Bulletins/How to Subscribe & Unsubscribe
3) About NRDC/How to Contact Us

The information in this bulletin is also available on our website at
http://www.nrdc.org/legislation/legwatch.asp. The web version links to
the text of bills and congressional web pages. To take action on these
and other environmental issues, visit NRDC's Earth Action Center at
http://www.nrdc.org/action, where you can use our online activism
tools or subscribe to Earth Action, our biweekly activist bulletin.

1) LEGISLATIVE WATCH

This is a status report on congressional action on the environment. To
make new or updated sections easy to find, we've highlighted them
with:
= N O T E ! =

11/8/01

With unfinished appropriations bills stalling over spending and
ideological differences (only eight of 16 appropriations bills have
been approved so far) and the economic stimulus and airline security
bills still on this year's legislative agenda, members of Congress are
beginning to talk about returning to Washington after Thanksgiving.
Meanwhile, some Senate Republicans may try to attach legislation that
would allow oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to the
economic stimulus bill.

...

Budget/Appropriations

= N O T E ! =
On 11/8, the Senate Finance Committee will meet to consider an
economic recovery package to counter the House $212 billion economic
stimulus bill, which passed 216-214, generally along party lines.
Support is mounting for Democratic proposals for infrastructure
spending in a stimulus package and as part of the Defense Department's
$20 billion emergency supplemental bill. Environmental groups, among
others, are pushing for a major boost in funding for projects that
would create jobs and help protect the environment, such as water
infrastructure projects that would ensure cleaner water, mass transit
projects such as high-speed rail, energy-efficiency projects, and
improvements to national parks.

= N O T E ! =
On 11/6, members of the conference committee working on the EPA
funding bill agreed to provide $7.9 billion for next year, almost $600
million more than the Bush administration requested. Conferees
restored $15 million in federal enforcement funds, increased resources
for water quality projects for cleaner beaches and improvements to
sewage and drinking water facilities, and embraced a new lower
standard limiting arsenic in drinking water. The conferees did include
language, however, that could delay implementing this arsenic standard
in smaller communities.

= N O T E ! =
On 11/5, President Bush signed the Interior funding bill, H.R. 2217.
The bill includes a ban on oil and gas development in national
monuments, and also would deny funds for studying oil and gas
development in sensitive coastal waters where offshore oil drilling is
currently off-limits. The bill retains language, however, that would
increase the number of cruise ships entering Glacier Bay National
Park, allow the weakening of hardrock mining protections, and
undermine environmental safeguards for national forests. Language
restricting oil and gas leasing in the eastern Gulf of Mexico was
dropped, allowing the Bush administration to move forward with
drilling in a new area that could adversely impact Florida beaches.

= N O T E ! =
On 11/1, both the House and Senate approved a $24.6 billion energy and
water funding bill that would trim funds from the Army Corps of
Engineers while increasing Energy Department, National Nuclear
Security Administration and Bureau of Reclamation funding. Renewable
energy research and development would receive $396 million next year
-- $21 million more than this year. The final bill includes Sen.
Stabenow's (D-MI) and Rep. Bonior's (D-MI) two-year ban on oil and gas
drilling in the Great Lakes, and contains a Senate compromise that
would allow water from the Missouri River to be released in the spring
in an effort to save three endangered species by restoring a more
natural flow to the river. The bill also provides $30 million in
federal funding for an important federal-state partnership to allocate
scarce California water.

On 10/31, the House directed its transportation appropriations
conferees not to agree to the Senate's funding levels during
conference negotiations. The Senate's $60 billion transportation
funding bill (S. 1178) includes an objectionable rider that would give
away a large parcel of environmentally sensitive land in Alaska's
Tongass National Forest for possible development. For the first time
in six years, the House transportation funding bill (H.R. 2299) does
not include language blocking the federal government from considering
whether vehicle fuel economy standards should be increased.

On 10/24, the Senate approved the Foreign Operations funding bill
(H.R. 2506), which President Bush has threatened to veto because of
language that overturns his executive order banning federal funds for
international family planning organizations that promote or perform
abortions. The Senate bill also contains an additional $295 million in
funding for a new international program to promote cleaner energy and
energy conservation. Funding for the Global Environment Facility,
which provides grants for projects that combat global warming and
promote sustainable development worldwide, has been increased only
slightly above last year's levels in the Senate bill. The
House-approved Foreign Operations funding bill includes a $25 million
cut in funds for the Global Environment Facility.

On 9/13, the Senate approved S. 1215, its bill for next year's funding
for the Commerce, Justice, and State departments. Although the Senate
included just over $3 billion for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (which manages ocean, coastal and fisheries programs),
it cut funds for addressing polluted coastal runoff. The Senate,
however, improved language in the bill that could have hindered
federal efforts to develop a system of protected marine areas. The
House approved its version of the funding bill (H.R. 2500) on 7/18.
Both the House and the Senate have appointed conferees to resolve
their differences on this bill.

For a step-by-step guide to our annual odyssey through resolutions,
reconciliations and appropriations, see NRDC's budget process fact
sheet (http://www.nrdc.org/legislation/fbudg.asp).

...

Clean Air and Energy

= N O T E ! =
On 11/1, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee held the
first of two hearings on S. 556, a bill co-authored by committee chair
Sen. Jeffords (I-VT) and Sen. Lieberman (D-CT). The bill seeks to
reduce four types of power plant emissions by imposing mandatory cuts
in carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, and mercury
emissions. At the hearing, Bush administration representatives opposed
regulating CO2 emissions, arguing that the costs on the economy would
be too high. The administration is expected to release a proposal that
would only regulate three of the four worst power plant pollutants,
reversing a Bush campaign promise to regulate carbon dioxide, a key
greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming. No action has been
taken on the House companion bill (H.R. 1256), which was introduced on
3/27 by Rep. Waxman (D-CA) and Rep. Boehlert (R-NY).

= N O T E ! =
On 11/1, the House Science Subcommittee on Energy heard from a panel
representing auto manufacturers, the electric vehicles industry, the
Energy Department and environmentalists on ways to decrease the
country's dependence on oil for transportation.

= N O T E ! =
Sen. Bingaman (D-NM), chair of the Energy and Natural Resources
Committee, is close to completing a proposal developed in consultation
with the leaders of other key committees for energy legislation that
could be enacted this year. Sen. Bingaman is expected to include
energy infrastructure security provisions as part of the legislation.
Senate Republican leaders plan to offer their own version of an energy
bill, which will likely call for oil drilling in the Arctic National
Wildlife Refuge, and provide insurance and immunity for nuclear power
plants.

On 10/17, the House passed its version of the Defense Authorization
bill (H.R. 2586); the Senate passed its version (S. 1438) on 10/2. The
bill is currently in conference committee to resolve differences
between the two bills. (See discussion under Public Lands below.)

Prior to 9/11, the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation
Committee began consideration of higher vehicle fuel economy
standards. On 8/2, Sen. Kerry (D-MA) held a hearing on the recent
National Academy of Sciences report on the importance of raising fuel
economy standards. The committee is expected to consider a bill (S.
804) introduced by Senators Feinstein (D-CA), Snowe (R-ME), Schumer
(D-NY), and Collins (R-ME), which seeks to tighten corporate fuel
economy standards for sport utility vehicles and light trucks. The
bill would require that SUVs and other light trucks increase fuel
economy to 27.5 mpg by model year 2007, expand the current fuel
economy standards to trucks weighing between 8,500-10,000 pounds by
2007, and raise the fuel economy of the federal government's fleet by
6 mpg. SUVs and light trucks currently use 43 percent more gasoline
per mile than the average car. H.R. 1815 is the House companion bill.

On 8/2, the House approved its version of an energy bill (H.R. 4) by a
vote of 240-189. The House passed four separate energy bills out of
four different committees, and combined them into one bill of more
than 500 pages that does little to create a sound, balanced energy
policy. Rather, the bill would provide tens of billions of dollars in
subsidies to the coal, oil, gas and nuclear industries, open the
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and other sensitive areas to oil and
gas drilling, weaken environmental protections for other public lands,
do little to improve fuel economy standards, and starve renewable
energy and energy efficiency programs of needed funding.

NRDC's report, A Responsible Energy Policy for the 21st Century
(http://www.nrdc.org/air/energy/rep/repinx.asp), outlines the
components of an alternative energy policy -- one that can meet the
nation's energy needs without destroying wilderness or rolling back
environmental safeguards.

...

Clean Water

= N O T E ! =
The Senate Agriculture Committee will be considering Chairman Harkin's
(D-IA) farm bill for at least the next two weeks. The energy section
of the bill provides more than $500 million for clean energy programs
that support wind power, biomass energy, fuel cells, and energy
efficiency improvements on farms. The bill contains language, however,
that would encourage logging on public lands. The conservation
provisions will be considered next week, and environmentalists are
hoping to ensure increased conservation program funding and
protections against subsidies to large factory farms.

= N O T E ! =
On 11/7, the House Resources Committee approved, generally along party
lines, H.R. 3208 (originally H.R. 1985), Rep. Calvert's (R-CA)
multi-billion dollar bill to reauthorize a federal and state
partnership in California that provides water for urban and
agricultural users, as well as for wildlife and habitat restoration.
Environmentalists oppose the bill because it would upset the balance
of this critical partnership, and could jeopardize the environmental
restoration that was expected to result. The bill would allow the
construction of new dams in California without appropriate review, and
could give agricultural water users priority over the environment. A
similar bill introduced by Sen. Feinstein (D-CA), with many of the
same problems as the Calvert bill, has been markedly improved through
negotiations with Sen. Boxer (D-CA). In the House, Rep. Miller (D-CA)
has introduced a bill, H.R. 2404, which would reauthorize the program
without harmful anti-environment provisions. Environmentalists support
the Miller bill.

On 10/5, the House approved a $70 billion farm bill (H.R. 2646) by a
vote of 291-120, after rejecting an amendment by Rep. Kind (D-WI) and
Rep. Boehlert (R-NY), supported by the environmental community, that
would have transferred $1.9 billion per year from commodity subsidies
to farm conservation, wetlands restoration, and wildlife habitat
programs, without weakening environmental standards for factory farms.
An amendment by Rep. D. Miller (R-FL) and Rep. G. Miller (D-CA) to
decrease sugar subsidies and apply the savings to Everglades
restoration also failed. The Bush administration criticized the House
bill because of its high price tag, large subsidies, and failure to
help the small farmer.

...

International Environmental Protections

On 10/16, the House Ways and Means Committee approved H.R. 3005, a
trade promotion bill introduced by the chair of the committee, Rep.
Thomas (R-CA). The bill grants "fast track," or expedited, authority
to the president to negotiate new trade agreements. House Speaker
Hastert (R-IL) announced that he intends to try to bring this bill to
the House floor for a vote shortly. Environmental, consumer, social
justice, and labor groups oppose this bill because it fails to ensure
adequate environmental and labor standards and could undermine current
protections. The bill, which is supported by the Bush administration,
is similar to fast track legislation that was rejected by Congress in
1997 and 1998, except that it provides even fewer positive labor and
environmental provisions, while offering more restrictions on public
safety and environmental protection. On 10/3, the ranking minority
members of the committee, Rep. Rangel (D-NY), and Rep. Levin (D-MI),
introduced their own trade bill (H.R. 3019), which has stronger
congressional oversight and environmental standards.

...

Marine Mammals

On 10/11, the House Resources Fisheries Conservation subcommittee held
a hearing on marine mammal issues, including the use of low frequency
active sonar by the Navy, which could harm whales and other marine
life. The Navy wants to deploy this sonar worldwide, but needs a
permit from the National Marine Fisheries Service. Numerous
scientists, as well as environmental and animal rights groups, have
joined forces to oppose the use of this sonar, both because of the
grave risks it presents to marine mammals and the inadequate
information that the Navy currently has about its impacts on marine
life.   

...

Nuclear

On 10/31, the House Energy and Commerce Committee approved a bill
(H.R. 2983) to reauthorize the Price-Anderson Act until 2017. This
act, which provides federal insurance for nuclear power plants in case
of an accident, is a huge subsidy to the nuclear industry.
Environmental groups oppose reauthorization because it would encourage
more nuclear power plant construction without addressing nuclear waste
contamination. It would also shift responsibility for the full cost of
nuclear power plant use from the nuclear industry to taxpayers.

...

Public Health

On 10/3, the House Science committee approved Rep. Ehlers' (R-MI) bill
(H.R. 64), which creates the position of deputy for science and
technology at the Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental
groups are concerned that this position could be used in a political
manner to undercut the science conducted at the agency and the
policies adopted as the result of it. Environmentalists have also
expressed disappointment that the bill fails to address major
scientific shortcomings at EPA, including significant reliance on
industry studies and external review by advisory committees that are
often dominated by industry representatives and researchers.

...

Public Lands

On 10/2 the Senate passed the Defense Authorization bill (S. 1438).
The House version (H.R. 2586) which passed on 9/25, includes
provisions that would allow the expansion of Fort Irwin in the
California desert, but would imperil the survival and recovery of
federally protected endangered species, such as the California desert
tortoise and Lane Mountain milkvetch. The House bill would end the
conservation of 36,000 acres of wildlands in the California Desert
that Congress has identified as meriting wilderness protection.
Environmentalists are pushing to provide for additional funding to
protect the tortoise and for the designation of new protected areas so
that the desert can be protected while supporting military readiness.
This bill is currently in conference to resolve differences between
the House and Senate bills.

...

For information on the environmental voting records of members of
Congress, see the League of Conservation Voter's National
Environmental Scorecards at http://www.lcv.org/scorecards/index.htm

...........

2) About Our Bulletins/How to Subscribe & Unsubscribe

NRDC distributes three bulletins by email. To subscribe to any or all
of them or to join our activist networks, go to
http://www.join.nrdcaction.org/subscribe.asp. If you already subscribe
and want to change your subscriptions or update your email address or
other information, go to http://www.join.nrdcaction.org/profileeditor
(or see the unsubscribe information below).

EARTH ACTION is sent biweekly and calls out urgent environmental
issues requiring immediate action. To unsubscribe from Earth Action,
send an email message to earthaction@nrdcaction.org with REMOVE in the
subject line.

LEGISLATIVE WATCH is sent biweekly when Congress is in session and
tracks environmental bills moving through the federal legislature. To
unsubscribe from Legislative Watch, send an email message to
legwatch@nrdcaction.org with REMOVE in the subject line.

The CALIFORNIA ACTIVIST NETWORK ACTION ALERT is distributed monthly to
members of NRDC's California Activist Network and provides action
tools to Californians and others concerned with protecting the state's
natural resources and the health of its citizens. To unsubscribe, send
an email message to wildcalifornia@nrdcaction.org with REMOVE in the
subject line.

...........

3) About NRDC/How to Contact Us

The Natural Resources Defense Council is a nonprofit environmental
organization with over 500,000 members nationwide and a staff of
scientists, attorneys and environmental experts. Our mission is to
protect the planet's wildlife and wild places and ensure a safe and
healthy environment for all living things.

For more information about NRDC or how to become a member of NRDC,
please contact us at:

Natural Resources Defense Council
40 West 20th Street
NY, NY 10011
212-727-4511 (voice) / 212-727-1773 (fax)
General information: nrdcinfo@nrdc.org
Email subscription questions: nrdcaction@nrdc.org
http://www.nrdc.org

Also visit:
BioGems -- Saving Endangered Wild Places
A project of the Natural Resources Defense Council
http://www.savebiogems.org

...........


from Global Response November 8, 2001

Dear Members of Global Response's "Quick Response Network:"

This is wonderful news:  Thanks to persistent efforts of environmental and
human rights activists and organizations around the world, Rodolfo Montiel
Flores and Teodoro Cabrera Garcia were released today after more than 2
years in prison.  In a press conference announcing their release, President
Fox noted the efforts of national and international human rights and
environmental groups in the case.  The men were released based on Article 75
of Mexican penal code relating to health reasons.

While we await the details of the mens' release, we think this is a great
day for environmental defenders around the world.  Please do pause for a
moment to appreciate and congratulate one another for every letter you wrote
on behalf of Montiel and Cabrera, leaders in grassroots efforts to stop
destructive industrial logging in Guerrero state.

This victory proves once again that conscientious citizens can make justice
prevail.

********************************
Paula Palmer, Executive Director
Global Response
PO Box 7490
Boulder CO 80306
Tel. 303-444-0306
Fax. 303-449-9794
Website: www.globalresponse.org

Mission:  Global Response empowers people of all ages, cultures, and
nationalities to protect the environment by creating partnerships for
effective citizen action.  At the request of indigenous peoples and
grassroots organizations, Global Response organizes international
letter-writing campaigns to help communities prevent environmental
destruction.  Global Response involves young people as well as adults in
these campaigns, to develop in them the values and skills for global citizen
cooperation and earth stewardship.

NEW!  Now you can make donations online at:  http://www.globalresponse.org


from Environmental Defense November 9, 2001

Take action to support Senator Leahy and Reid's Farm
Bill proposal, which will boost federal funds to help
farmers help the environment.

You can take action on this alert either via email
(please see directions below) or via the web at:
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/farm_reform_senate4/wk8bxn4z78xbii

Visit the web address below and tell your friends to
take action on this important campaign!
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/farm_reform_senate4/forward/wk8bxn4z78xbii

We encourage you to take action by December 8, 2001

Helping Farmers Help the Environment! ONTO THE SENATE

----------------------

***************************  
Action Network from Environmental Defense.  
Finding the ways that work.  
***************************  

This week, Senators Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Harry
Reid of Nevada will introduce their Farm Bill proposal,
which will boost federal funds to preserve farm, ranch
and forest lands, improve water quality, protect food
and drinking water supplies, restore habitat for wildlife,
and more.  

URGENT ACTION NEEDED:
Since last year, over 46,000 Action Network activists
have taken action to help farmers help the environment.
However, the House of Representatives narrowly defeated
an effort to shift $1.9 billion a year from commodity
crop programs into critical conservation programs and
approved an anti-environmental Farm Bill that favors
the very largest farmers. Therefore, it is even more
important that the Senate approves a Farm Bill that
will protect natural resources and public health, and
be fair to all states and all kinds of farmers.

Take action today! Urge your Senator to co-sponsor
the Leahy-Reid Farm Bill proposal to help reward farmers,
ranchers and private forest landowners when they help
meet our environmental challenges.

In addition to sending a fax, please call your Senator
as well. For phone numbers, visit http://www.congressmerge.com
or contact sfriedman@environmentaldefense.org.

To see an overview of the Leahy-Reid proposal, visit
http://www.environmentaldefense.org/programs/AgriReform/LeahyAlert.html

For more information about Environmental Defense's
efforts to reform agricultural practices, visit: http://www.environmentaldefense.org/programs/Ecosystems/AgriReform/

Questions? Contact Suzy Friedman, Agriculture Policy
Analyst and Organizer, at sfriedman@environmentaldefense.org


----------------------

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA THE WEB:
If you have access to a web browser, you can take action
on this alert by going to the following URL:

http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/farm_reform_senate4/wk8bxn4z78xbii  

INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPOND VIA EMAIL:
Just choose the "reply to sender" option on your email
program, and edit the letter below as you wish. Do
not delete "-YOU MAY EDIT THE LETTER BELOW-" and "-END
OF LETTER-". Please do not add your name and address
to your letter. Our system automatically does this
for you.  

We STRONGLY encourage you to make edits directly to
our sample letter below, and put the alert talking
points into your own words. An individualized letter
is worth ten computer generated letters. Of course,
hundreds of unedited letters will still create a large
impact, so please reply even if you don't have time
to personalize the letter.

Your letter will be addressed and sent to:
Senator Charles Schumer


-------YOU MAY EDIT THE LETTER BELOW---------

Please co-sponsor Senators Leahy and Reid's Farm Bill
proposal. Their proposal would make conservation and
environmental protection central to the Farm Bill,
would ensure more states and farmers get their fair
share of federal agriculture help, and would avoid
violating important world trade agreements.  

There is growing national support for major reform
of federal agricultural programs from President Bush,
200 members of the House of Representatives, and others.
Refocusing farm subsidies on conservation would provide
benefits to many more farmers across the nation, not
just the largest corporate farms, and would make better
use of taxpayer dollars. This effort was closely defeated
in the House, so your leadership to ensure a conservation-oriented,
regionally equitable Senate Farm Bill is critical.

Today, most farmers, ranchers and private forest landowners
seeking federal help to clean up water, combat sprawl
or help wildlife are rejected due to inadequate funding.
For example, three in four farmers and ranchers seeking
financial assistance to clean water are rejected.

The Leahy-Reid Farm Bill would provide new funds to
protect farmland and open space from sprawl, restore
wildlife habitat, encourage organic farming, restore
wetlands, and more. Unless we reward farmers when they
meet our environmental challenges, one third of rivers
and lakes will remain polluted, hundreds of species
will creep closer to extinction, and millions of acre
of open space will be lost.  

Please co-sponsor the Leahy-Reid Farm Bill to ensure
that the next Farm Bill helps protect our natural resources,
public health, and agricultural communities.

-------END OF LETTER-------------------------


from Care2 alerts November 9, 2001

YOUR ACTION: Care2's alerts newsletter features important
steps YOU can quickly take to help make the world greener and
safer.

Dear Friend:

I'm worried about antibiotics. Recent threats of bioterrorism have
highlighted how important it is that we safeguard the
effectiveness of America's antibiotics supply to fight all kinds
of bacterial infections. But it turns out that Bayer Corporation
is putting our public health at risk.

Bayer - the maker of Cipro - is refusing to comply with a ban
proposed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the use of
Bayer's antibiotic, Baytril(R), in treating chickens and turkeys.
I'm helping to launch a campaign to tell Bayer that I don't want
them "playing chicken" with our health! Will you help? Just click
here to send a FREE message to Bayer:
http://www.care2.com/go/redirect/2/2585

FDA recommended a ban on Baytril(R) after their scientists found
that using Baytril(R) in chicken farming contributes to the
development of bacterial infections, such as food poisoning, in
humans that are resistant to antibiotic treatment.

Baytril is very closely related to a drug used in human medicine,
known as Cipro, and both are members of a class of antibiotics
known as fluoroquinolones. Though Cipro is currently making
headlines as a treatment for anthrax, it also plays a key role in
treating many other diseases, including severe cases of bacterial
food poisoning.

Bayer has refused to listen to these scientific concerns and
their decision to challenge the ban puts profits over public
health. Because of antibiotic overuse, infectious bacterial diseases are
emerging that we may not be able to cure because antibiotics
won't work. You CAN do something to help.
Just click here to take action:
http://www.care2.com/go/redirect/2/2585

It only takes a minute to help. And if you forward this message to
your friends and family, we'll really get the ball rolling.

Click here to help: http://www.care2.com/go/redirect/2/2585


from Global Response November 9, 2001

Hi, Global Response members.  Here are a couple articles about the release
of Rodolfo Montiel and Teodoro Cabrera in Mexico.

See the Environmental News Service article at:
http://www.ens-news.com/ens/nov2001/2001L-11-08-03.html.

A Reuters article is copied below, followed by an unofficial translation of
the statement issued by Mexican president Vicente Fox.

                UPDATE - Mexico frees two jailed environmentalists 

                Mail this story to a friend | Printer friendly version
                MEXICO: November 9, 2001

                MEXICO CITY - Mexican President Vicente Fox freed
                two prominent environmentalists from prison
                yesterday amid widespread allegations that they had
                been tortured into signing false confessions on bogus
                charges.

                Rodolfo Montiel and Teodoro Cabrera had led protests
                against illegal logging activities in the southern state of
                Guerrero before they were jailed in May 1999 on weapons
                and drugs offenses.

                Both men say they only confessed after being tortured for
                several days and claim they were being punished for their
                attempts to defend the forests of the Sierra Madre mountain
                range from rapacious logging.

                They were backed by international human rights groups and
                have been awarded a number of prestigious human rights
                and environmental awards.

                Fox had been under intense pressure from rights groups to
                take action in their case, and his move yesterday
                immediately freed the two from prison in Iguala, Guerrero.

                Fox said he had taken into account requests for their
                freedom, their medical condition and a report from a U.N.
                working group on arbitrary arrests.

                "With these actions we demonstrate through deeds my
                government's commitment to the promotion and observance
                of human rights in our country," Fox said at a news
                conference, adding that their release was in line with
                international conventions on human rights and torture.

                The case returned to the national spotlight last month when
                one of Mexico's most prominent human rights lawyers,
                Digna Ochoa, was shot dead in her office.

                Ochoa had represented Montiel and Cabrera, and officials
                believe her murder was linked to the ongoing disputes
                between environmentalists and logging interests in
                Guerrero.

                "The lines of inquiry are pointing toward the state of
                Guerrero, toward the conflicts of the peasant farmers with
                logging groups," Mexico City Prosecutor Bernardo Batiz
                said earlier this week.

                Mexico's state news agency Notimex quoted Mariclaire
                Acosta, the government's top human rights official, as
                saying Montiel and Cabrera were released on humanitarian
                grounds because they both suffered from poor health.

                Montiel was imprisoned for seven years on charges that he
                cultivated marijuana and was in possession of weapons,
                while Cabrera received a 10-year sentence on gun charges.

                The sentences were upheld earlier this year by a state
                appeals court, but rights groups alleged corruption in
                Guerrero's courts and members of Fox's Cabinet were
                openly skeptical of the charges against Montiel and
                Cabrera.

                Story by Kieran Murray
                REUTERS NEWS SERVICE


  UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION

     Statement made by President Vicente Fox regarding the release of 
     Rodolfo Montiel Flores and Teodoro Cabrera García 

              Mexico City, November 8, 2001

Statement  made  this  afternoon  by  President Vicente Fox Quesada, in the
Venustiano  Carranza  Room  of  the  Mexican  Presidential Residence at Los
Pinos.


Today,  exercising the legal powers that the Mexican legal system invest to
the  President of Mexico, I ordered that the necessary measures be taken to
free  Rodolfo  Montiel Flores and Teodoro Cabrera García, who were arrested
on May 2, 1999, in Pizotla, Guerrero.

Rodolfo  Montiel  Flores  and  Teodoro  Cabrera  García  at this moment are
already free.

Since  December  1,  2000,  satisfying  numerous  requests  by national and
international  human  rights organizations, my Administration took interest
in this matter.

Therefore,  the  Mexican  Government  commissioned  a group of attorneys to
provide legal support and advice to the council of both convicts.

Taken   into   consideration   the  requests  by  several  non-governmental
organizations,  such  as  the Ecological Organization of Sierra de Petatlán
and  Coyuca  de  Catalán  and  the "Miguel Agustín Pro Juárez" Human Rights
Center;  the opinion issued by the Working Group on Arbitrary Detentions of
the  United  Nations;  the  health  of both convicts, and Article 75 of the
Federal  Penal  Code, today I ordered the release of Rodolfo Montiel Flores
and Teodoro Cabrera Garcia.

This  determination  is  in  line  with  the Universal Declaration on Human
Rights,  the  International  Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the
Convention  against  Torture,  all  of  which  were  signed and ratified by
Mexico.

With  this  actions,  the  Mexican Government shows its commitment to human
rights in Mexico.

Thank you very much.

********************************
Paula Palmer, Executive Director
Global Response
PO Box 7490
Boulder CO 80306
Tel. 303-444-0306
Fax. 303-449-9794
Website: www.globalresponse.org

Mission:  Global Response empowers people of all ages, cultures, and
nationalities to protect the environment by creating partnerships for
effective citizen action.  At the request of indigenous peoples and
grassroots organizations, Global Response organizes international
letter-writing campaigns to help communities prevent environmental
destruction.  Global Response involves young people as well as adults in
these campaigns, to develop in them the values and skills for global citizen
cooperation and earth stewardship.


from American Lands November 9, 2001

To:     All Activists
Fr:     Lisa Dix, American Lands Campaign
Date:   November 9, 2001

Fundamental Environmental Protections Jeopardized
Under Mark Rey's Leadership

On November 7, 2001, Mark Rey, Undersecretary for the Environment and
Natural Resources for the U.S. Department of Agriculture, testified in
front of the House Subcommittee on Forests and Forest Health.  Rey,
former timber industry lobbyist, provided the Subcommittee with many
insights on the way he will use his timber industry connections and the
powerful backing by his former bosses Senator Larry Craig (R-ID) and
Senator Frank Murkowski (R-AK) to advance a pro-resource extraction
agenda in his reign as political boss of the U.S. Forest Service over
the next years.  

Chipping Away at Fundamental Laws
Rey made it clear that this Administration will chip away at and try to
overturn fundamental environmental laws such as the National Forest
Management Act (NFMA), the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).  Rey articulated several times
throughout the hearing how laws such as the NFMA, the ESA, and NEPA,
need to be "re-examined," "reviewed" and "re-opened."  These laws,
according to Rey, were "holding up projects on the ground," and were
simply "outdated."  He used section 6 of the NFMA as an example of how
this legislation was "an artifact of an era" by stating that this
section prohibited species conversion from hardwood stands to pine
plantations, and that was old news.  However, as forest activists still
know, hardwood conversion is not an outdated practice.  In fact, the
Forest Service now has a huge pot of money in the fire budget to thin
and burn hardwoods in some eastern forests, under the guise of
"catastrophic wildfire threat," to ensure that pine plantations continue
to exist solely for the purposes of commercial logging.

In addition to making several remarks about wanting to change
environmental laws to better meet on the ground needs, Rey expressed
interest in providing the Forest Service with the ability to use
categorical exclusions more often.  Rey stated that any activity in or
around endangered species habitat or in roadless areas requires an
environmental assessment (EA) or an environmental impact statement
(EIS), which wastes the time of resource managers and taxpayer dollars.  
He ensured Congress that he was not trying to cut the public out of the
process but that he wanted it to be easier for the on the ground
managers to "do their jobs" and "carry out projects on the ground." Rey
failed to mention that the commercial timber sale program costs
taxpayers over a billion dollars a year in direct and indirect costs.  
And, Congress mandated the Forest Service to do EAs and EISs because on
the ground managers "doing their job" by intensely extracting resources
in an unrestricted fashion caused immense ecological damage and public
outcry.  Congress rightly recognized that public scrutiny is needed to
make sure that managers do not cause ecological harm by simply "doing
their job."  

Co-opting the Language of Restoration and Fuels Reduction to Continue
the Commercial Timber Sale Program
The concepts of catastrophic wildfire and "restoration" are going be
major driving forces behind continuing the timber sale program under the
Rey Forest Service.  The money is there.  The timber program is funded
at $266 million dollars; the fuels reduction budget is funded at $209
million for the Forest Service.  Not to mention the off budget funds,
and the authority for the Forest Service to enter into 84 total
stewardship contract pilot projects for restoration activities and fuel
reduction projects.  One of the contracting authorities, "goods for
services," allows the Forest Service to trade an unlimited amount of
trees to contractors for payment of their "restoration" work. Another
stewardship contracting authority called "receipt retention" allows the
Forest Service to create another off budget fund (like the KV fund)
which any money made from restoration will go to fund more restoration
projects, with little oversight or accountability. Receipt retention
gives the Forest Service the incentive to mix commercial timber sales
with restoration projects as so as more restoration can be funded, and
more restoration work can be done, creating an endless cycle of logging
for restoration.

Mark Rey seems to believe that "science" should be the foundation for
fuels reduction and restoration.  However, Rey shared his insights about
"science" many times in the hearing.  He stated that there should be ESA
exemptions for fuels reduction projects in threatened and endangered
species habitat, because "science" says logging to restore that habitat
is needed.  The same is true according to Rey about the "science" that
says we need to log in watersheds to restore them, we need to log to
bring about old growth characteristics in the forest, and we need to log
to deal with wildfire threats.  Basically, Rey's "science," espouses
that we need to log it to restore it "in every instance," insuring that
the commercial timber sale program will continue to drive restoration
and fuels reduction under Rey's leadership.

Overturning the Roadless Policy
Roadless protection is also in deep peril under Rey's leadership.  Rey
announced at the hearing that he is participating in a "good faith
dialogue" with a "consortium of conservation organizations" organized by
the Teddy Roosevelt Institute, about how to change the rule to make it
more "balanced."  Strategically, Rey is trying to divide and conquer the
alliance in favor of protecting roadless areas.  By excluding
environmental organizations, and by including hunting, fishing and
wildlife groups along with industry in this "dialogue" he can tell
Congress that "conservationists" and industry agreed on a deal on
Roadless protection.  

When pressed by Representatives Jay Inslee (D-WA), Tom Udall (D-NM),
Dale Kildee (D-MI), and Rush Holt (D-NJ) about why the Administration is
not following through with roadless protection, Rey stated that both the
process of how the rule was developed and the exclusion of local
communities are why the rule needs to be fixed.  From a process
standpoint, Rey complained that the Clinton Administration announced
that they were going to protect roadless areas before the rule was
finished, making it hard for those who might have wanted to go to one of
the over 600 hearings feel defeated from the start.  That's why,
according to Rey, opponents of the roadless rule did not go to the
hearings or write comments.  When asked by Rep. Tom Udall (D-NM) if he
was planning on holding hearings about the changes to the rule, Rey said
that he is having "dialogue" now with a broad range of interests "about
how to proceed," which included "local governments, conservationists,
and industry."  When asked by Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA) why the Forest
Service did not feel that 1.6 million comments favoring protection of
roadless were enough to proceed in protecting roadless areas, Mark Rey
stated "counting heads should not be the way we manage National
Forests."  Rey, also stated that "1.2 million comments were delivered in
the last day" but the remaining "200,000 comments were more balanced."  
According to Rey 70% of those remaining 200,000 comments came from
"local" interests and "local government" and they did not support
roadless protection.  Rey seemed to indicate that the "local" comments
were the only important comments, although the forests belong to all
Americans.    

When asked about his vision for protecting roadless areas, Rey stated
"protecting roadless values does not mean protecting every roadless acre
we have out there now."  Rey elaborated that roadless areas should be
protected on a forest by forest basis through the planning process, and
wilderness proposals should be brought to Congress after being
identified for protection through the planning process.  What Rey failed
to mention is that many forest plans, based on outdated science have not
been revised, Congress just passed a rider allowing the Forest Service
to continue with those outdated plans, the National Forest Management
Act regulations are in flux, and planning alone has been insufficient in
protection roadless and wilderness values.  

Conclusion
Mark Rey made it clear that his tenure as political boss of the Forest
Service is going to be about serving big industry needs at the expense
of ecological protection.  Forest advocates have to focus their
education work on Congress if the fundamental values found in
environmental laws and administrative rules are to be preserved.  There
are not enough forest champions in Congress.  It is our responsibility
as advocates to educate our Members of Congress about our visions of
restoration and ecological protection.  We need articulate Members of
Congress who are able to act to protect and make better the fundamental
laws which we have fought so long to keep and to vocalize and move a
vision in Congress based on protecting wildlife and wild places in
perpetuity.


from Union of Concerned Scientists November 9, 2001

*************************UCS ACTION ALERT UPDATE******************

The purpose of this email is to provide an update on the action alert circulated on Thursday, November 8th, calling for you to contact your Senators and urge them to sign the Renewable Energy Letter being circulated  by Senators Reid (D-NV) and Cantwell (D-WA).

Because the Daschle-Bingaman timetable has slipped a little for assembling a comprehensive energy bill, the DEADLINE FOR TAKING ACTION HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO NOON ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13th.

As many Senators have headed to their homes for the holiday, this may present opportunities for contacting them in their district offices this weekend. The original action alert including key messages and links to contact information is included below for your reference.

Thank you to all those who have already taken action.  As of 2:00 PM today, 17 Senators have signed on to the dear colleague letter, including

Sen. Boxer (D-CA)
Sen. Cantwell (D-WA)
Sen. Dayton (D-MN)
Sen. Dorgan (D-ND)
Sen. Feingold (D-WI)
Sen. Feinstein (D-CA)
Sen. Lieberman (D-CT)
Sen. Jeffords (I-VT)
Sen. Leahy (D-VT)
Sen. Mikulski (D-MD)
Sen. Kennedy (D-MA)
Sen. Kerry (D-MA)
Sen. Harkin (D-IA)
Sen. Reed (D-RI)
Sen. Reid (D-NV)
Sen. Schumer (D-NY)
Sen. Wellstone (D-MN)



November 8, 2001
*************************UCS ACTION ALERT*************************

Contact your Senators TODAY and urge them to sign the Renewable
Energy Letter being circulated  by Senators Reid (D-NV) and Cantwell (D-WA).

ISSUE:
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD) recently directed committee chairs to forward recommendations to him for a comprehensive national energy bill to be ready to introduce on the Senate floor this year.

The "Dear Colleague" letter that Senators Reid and Cantwell are circulating urges Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD) to include a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) and a Production Tax Credit (PTC) in the comprehensive energy package. The RPS requires that a minimum percentage of electricity come from renewable energy sources like wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass. The PTC would provide renewable energy developers with the economic support they need to become competitive with other, dirtier and heavily subsidized forms of energy such as coal, oil and nuclear.

ACTION:
Call or email your Senators and urge them to sign on to the letter TODAY. The deadline for sign ons is noon tomorrow - Friday, Nov. 9, 2001.

To contact your Senators:
- By telephone, call the Capitol Switchboard at (202) 224-3121
- Obtain e-mail and fax information by visiting the Senate web site (www.senate.gov)

MESSAGE:
Tell your Senators that increasing production of renewable energy - such as wind, solar, geothermal, and biomass - is important to provide safe, clean, and affordable power for Americans.  Senators Reid and Cantwell are circulating a letter asking Senator Daschle to include a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) and a Production Tax Credit (PTC) for renewable energy into the comprehensive energy package.  An RPS would require that utilities provide some percentage of their electricity from renewable power sources by a certain year. Analysis by the Union of Concerned Scientists (Clean Energy Blueprint available at www.ucsusa.org/energy/blueprint.html) shows that a 20 percent RPS by 2020, when combined with the PTC and additional policies to improve energy efficiency, can save consumers money, improve our environment, and over time reduce risks to national security.

The sign on letter does not endorse any particular percentage or year for the RPS, nor does it ask Senators to endorse any particular number or year. A PTC would provide renewable energy with the economic support they need to become competitive with other, dirtier and heavily subsidized forms of energy such as coal, oil and nuclear.


FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Please contact Jeff Deyette (jdeyette@ucsusa.org) or visit the UCS Clean Energy Program web site at www.ucsusa.org/energy


from Greenpeace November 9, 2001

Precedence: list
X-Bulkmail: 2.05

Positive Energy
November 5 - 11
v1.20

Greenpeace's Clean Energy Now Campaign Weekly
Good News update - "Positive Energy"

*** SAN FRANCISCO VOTES YES ON SOLAR!!!!

On November 6, 2001, San Franciscans voted in favor of two
solar power initiatives that will make the city a national
leader in solar energy use. Propositions B and H will fund
up to 50 megawatts of solar power, far more than the
8 megawatts of solar in nearby Sacramento, the country's
largest current installation. Greenpeace's Solar Yes!
campaign was an integral part of the success of the solar
ballot measures. The vote sends a strong, clear message to
politicians in Sacramento that fossil fuels are dirty,
expensive, and insecure and they cause global warming.

Not only will the success in the San Francisco be a major
boost for the solar industry by creating a large increase
in domestic demand, it will also spur others to take
similar steps.

To read more about the solar victory and
the Clean Energy Now! campaign, go to:
http://www.cleanenergynow.org/features/sfsolarvictory.html  

Check out this excellent online article at MSNBC website:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/654034.asp#BODY


*** ANOTHER SOLAR VICTORY!!!

Greenpeace's Clean Energy Now! campaign scored a major
victory on Friday, November 2nd  when the Board of the
California Power Authority (CPA) approved a request for
proposals for installing 160 Megawatts (MW) of photovoltaic
systems.

The Greenpeace campaign has been hounding the CPA to make
major investments in solar power to reduce California's
reliance on natural gas and be a vanguard in
the Clean Energy Revolution.

The CPA initially planned 60 MW of solar panels, but after
hearing the arguments of Greenpeace and others, the CPA
decided to more than double their original request.

160 MW of PV installations will require 50% of the
photovoltaic panels currently manufactured in the
United States each year.

If used on residential buildings these systems would
provide power to 13,000 California homes, at 3 KW per
home. Over a 25-year lifetime these panels will produce
over 7000 Gig Watt-hours of electricity and will
displace 1.66 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions.

Thanks for your help on this...

To learn more about the CPA and the
Clean Energy Now Campaign, go to:
http://www.cleanenergynow.org/california/cpa.html

*** Greening The Universities: A Focus On Buildings

Join students, educators, and environmentalists from around
California on Saturday, November 10th from 8:30am - 4:00 pm
at Stanford University (Science & Engineering Quad,
Teaching Center, Rm 200) for an inspiring symposium on
sustainability and green building.  Amory Lovins, renowned
author of the book "Natural Capitalism," will close the s
ymposium with a keynote address.

For a full agenda and more information on the symposium
send e-mail to kaguy@stanford.edu
or call (650) 723-4270.

PS Last Monday we said Senator Boxer was up for re-election
in 2002 - she is not. But we are still going to organize
the Californian constituency she represents to press her
to become Congress' climate champion.

The "Positive Energy" newsletter and the web site,
http://www.cleanenergynow.org, will give you good news about
ways to achieve clean air, climate justice and renewable
energy solutions to our current energy crisis.

Want to do more? Become a Greenpeace member today!
http://www.greenpeaceusa.org/join2/cen.htm


from ETC Group November 9, 2001

ETC group News Release:
9 November 2001
www.etcgroup.org


US Government's $2.5 Million
Biopiracy Project in Mexico Cancelled

Victory for Indigenous Peoples in Chiapas

After two years of intense local opposition from indigenous peoples'
organizations in Chiapas, Mexico, the US government-funded ICBG-Maya
project aimed at the bioprospecting of Mayan medicinal plants and
traditional knowledge has been "definitively cancelled" by the
Project's Chiapas-based partner, ECOSUR - El Colegio de la Frontera
Sur. The US government confirmed today that the ICBG-Maya Project has
been terminated.

"The definitive cancellation of the ICBG-Maya project is important
for all indigenous peoples in Mexico. Indigenous communities are
asking for a moratorium on all biopiracy projects in Mexico, so that
we can discuss, understand and propose our own alternative approaches
to using our resources and knowledge. We want to insure that no one
can patent these resources and that the benefits are shared by all."
- Antonio Perez Mendez, indigenous doctor and secretary of the
Council of Traditional Indigenous Doctors and Midwives from Chiapas
(Consejo de Médicos y Parteras Indígenas Tradicionales de Chiapas -
COMPITCH).

"We see the cancellation of the ICBG-Maya as a victory, but we also
realize that we must develop capacity to respond with our own
economic alternatives. If not, we will continue to see foreign
projects which seek to privatize our resources and knowledge." -
Rafael Alarcón, advisor to COMPITCH

ECOSUR's decision to withdraw its support for ICBG-Maya is the final
blow for the ill-conceived biopiracy project - which not only faced
widespread opposition from indigenous peoples organizations in
Chiapas, but also last year failed to get regulatory approval from
the Mexican government (that is, permission to conduct bio-assays on
collected plant materials).

The $2.5 million dollar ICBG-Maya project, entitled "Drug Discovery
and Biodiversity among the Maya in Mexico," was funded by the US
government in September 1998, and included the University of
Georgia-Athens (UGA), USA, the Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR),
Mexico, and Molecular Nature Limited (MNL), a Welsh biotechnology
company. The International Collaborative Biodiversity Group (ICBG),
is a US government initiative involving the National Institutes of
Health, the National Science Foundation and the US Department of
Agriculture (USDA).

No Means No!  "Despite all the talk about 'prior informed consent'
and the 'right to say no,' it took two years for the indigenous
peoples of Chiapas to convince the ICBG-Maya that no means no. The
Project was unacceptable to many indigenous communities in Chiapas
that oppose commercial exploitation of their genetic resources and
traditional knowledge," explains Silvia Ribeiro of ETC group. "ECOSUR
has made a responsible decision and now seeks to re-build community
support for its public research programs," adds Ribeiro.

Slow to Go: The ICBG Maya Project was staunchly defended by its
director, anthropologist Brent Berlin of the University of Georgia.
Failing to win consensus at the local level, and facing increasing
criticism internationally, Berlin sought to redesign the project and
salvage it. In August 2001 Berlin proposed to ECOSUR that a
re-designed project would seek to define the risks and benefits of
bioprospecting, train indigenous leaders on ethical norms related to
prior informed consent, and develop an informational campaign on the
risks and benefits of bioprospecting for indigenous communities.
Although ICBG approved the new project, to be financed by a
re-direction of funds from the first ICBG Maya proposal, the advisory
board of ECOSUR rejected it. On 7 October 2001, perhaps in a
last-ditch effort to win approval for the project, a representative
from the US Embassy in Mexico travelled to Chiapas to meet with
representatives from COMPITCH, the indigenous group in Chiapas most
active in protesting the project. Again, the local communities said no.

Lessons Learned?  The decisive rejection of the ICBG-Maya, and the
continuing struggles of indigenous peoples in Chiapas to defend their
collective rights over biodiversity and traditional knowledge, offers
valuable lessons for bioprospectors worldwide, including the
US-government's remaining ICBG projects in Latin America, Asia and
Africa.

Ultimately, neither well-meaning anthropologists nor civil society
organizations can make decisions for indigenous peoples; nor can
outsiders appoint organizations to determine who will legitimately
represent the interests of indigenous communities. The collective
rights of indigenous peoples must be respected, as well as the
fundamental right of local communities to veto projects that target
their resources and knowledge.

In a world where biological products and processes are being
privatized and patented, and where Farmers' Rights are being trampled
by intellectual property and trade agreements, it is not surprising
that proprietary rights are confounding negotiations at the local,
national and international levels. Equity-based bioprospecting is a
myth in the absence of regulatory mechanisms that safeguard the
rights and interests of farmers, indigenous peoples and local
communities.

Unanswered Questions: What will happen to plant materials collected
in Chiapas prior to the termination of the Project? While it is
understood that bio-assays were not conducted on these plants, how
will the University of Georgia and ECOSUR insure that any plant
collections are repatriated to the local communities?

For more information, contact: Silvia Ribeiro, ETC group:
silvia@etcgroup.org  tel: 52-5563-2664

Hope Shand, ETC group: hope@etcgroup.org   tel: (919) 960-5223

In Chiapas: Consejo de Médicos y Parteras Indígenas Tradicionales de
Chiapas - COMPITCH
Antonio Perez Mendez, Rafael Alarcon (52) 967 85438 : compitch@hotmail.com


The Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration, formerly
RAFI, is an international civil society organization headquartered in
Canada. The ETC group (pronounced Etcetera group) is dedicated to the
advancement of cultural and ecological diversity and human rights.


from Greenpeace November 9, 2001

The Greenpeace flagship Rainbow Warrior is anchored near the World Trade Organisation meeting in Doha, Qatar. Here is the first update from the meeting.

***

Friday, 9 November 2001

First of a series of daily updates from Jo Dufay in Doha, Qatar, on the World Trade Organisation meeting.  

Highlights:  Day One

· WTO meeting officially opens
· US, EU pressure developing nations on 'New Round'
· Canada chairing key committee on environment = bad news
· 'Deep differences remain' says Mike Moore
· NGOs protest at opening session
· 'Radio No New Round' starts web and pirate FM broadcast from Rainbow Warrior, Doha Harbour

'We have learned lessons in Seattle' said WTO Director General Mike Moore at the opening session of the 4th Ministerial conference, in Doha Qatar, last night.  'Some of our critics are correct' he added.   What lessons, precisely, were learned, remains to be seen.  

Among a flurry of security, NGO representatives made their protest over the absence of civil society voices within the WTO.  Holding signs that said 'No voice in the WTO', people from about thirty public interest groups stood at the beginning of the opening session.  They were quickly surrounded by a mix of white-robed and grey-suited security people.    The protest ended peacefully.  Although the Qatari hosts of this meeting have been courteous, the message from the WTO is clear  -- there is a narrow tolerance for protest.  

The opening ceremonies marked the end of a day of tension, where nothing happened on the surface but tensions and suspicion ran deep. One of the lessons learned from Seattle is that developed countries and industries need ed to be  better organised, and they are.  Recently, the US invited trade ministers from African countries to Washington, DC where they were wined and dined and told that the US was ready to consider ways level the econom ic playing field to help their exports.  However there was also pressure for the African countries to drop some of their WTO objections.   

Corporate interests, too, are better organised.  There are at least as many industry-side 'NGOs' here as public interest NGOs, and most are moving smoothly behind the scenes to persuade delegations that trade liberalisati on is the way forward, and all other concerns are secondary.   

Six working groups have been formed to try to resolve some of the controversial areas facing this meeting.  They will cover things like drug patents, agriculture and investment.  One of the committees will deal with the e nvironment.  The core issue is: which gets protected first - trade or the environment?  Disappointingly, this committee is chaired by Canada - a country with an extremist position on favouring trade over the environment. The Canadian delegation is 40 strong, not one official from the environment ministry.  

The Greenpeace flagship 'Rainbow Warrior' has been allowed to moor in Doha Harbour.  From the deck you can see the modern white pyramid that is the Sheraton Hotel, primary site of the WTO conference.  Although armed patro l boats cruise by the ship at regular intervals, from the ship the city is visible only as sugar-cube architecture and modern sky-rises.  

Across the water you don't see the military security zone that has clamped down on large areas of the city.  Many roads are closed, and a security cordon with several layers of defence has been thrown around the Sheraton. The military consists of mercenary soldiers in camouflage fatigues - interestingly for a desert state these are in blue tones, rather than khaki or green!    Transportation is very limited, and moving between the ship a nd any of several conference sites is time consuming and difficult.  

Despite the security situation, the atmosphere is not one of fear except when the US delegation sweeps by, walking through the Sheraton huddled together, with a phalanx of security guards surrounding them.   

The narrow tolerance for protest here has caused many comments. Without a doubt, the Qatari cultural reality works to the advantage of those who would like to meet without having to deal with the concerns of civil society .  However, the lack of transparency and inclusivity by the WTO goes far beyond the right to protest. There is simply no place for our voice in the meetings, and we have to claw around the edges to find a place there.  Much of our work is in acting as a conduit for information, between and among delegations, and as 'translators' to explain the real meaning and implications of events and texts.  .  

Just after 11AM Saturday morning No New Round Radio began its FM radio transmissions (89.6 FM) and web broadcasts from, onboard the Rainbow Warrior in Doha harbour.  You can find it on (www.greenpeace.org/politics/wto/Doha/index.html) or (www.indymedia.org). The FM signal is loud and clear. Local and international coverage of the Rainbow Warrior has been fantastic.  

In Seattle, protests on the streets highlighted differences within the meeting.  Here, street protests are not possible but as Mike Moore said  yesterday 'deep differences remain'.

VISIT THE CYBERCENTRE

Please don't forget to visit the Greenpeace Cyberactivist Community at:
http://act.greenpeace.org


from Greenpeace November 9, 2001

Greenpeace WTO Update Number 2

Saturday, 10 November 2001

Highlights

Differences emerge over drug patents; dumping
Is a deal going down?
Allegationsof coercion and arm twisting – NGOs protest
Canada pulled as chair of environment committee
'Radio No New Round' goes to VHF
Headof UNCTAD visits Rainbow Warrior


The bidding has begun on the Trade-deal trade-off, here in Doha. Qatar, on the first full day of WTO talks.   Countries laid out their opening positions and hinted at negotiating stances, but it is clear that most of the deals will go down far from the eyes of the world, and even further from the voices and hearts of ordinary people.  

It was in many ways, a day to accentuate differences.    The strongest positions were staked on the issues of drug patents, anti-dumping measures and market access for least developed countries.    

There were also blunt allegations that developed countries have been coercing developing nations through aid offered or withheld and promises of market access that may never be fulfilled.  Developing countries spoke passionately about these pressures from rich nations, but such is the power dynamic that they were reluctant to name names for the media.   Based on off-the record briefings, however, NGO representatives lined up outside the exit point for the US delegation, and chanted ‘No Arm Twisting:  No intimidation’.  Security personnel moved in, and the protest ended peacefully after about 20 minutes.  

Although many brave countries are prepared to take principled positions, there is a smell of a deal going down.  The rich nations desperately want to call the next set of trade liberalisation talks “The Development Round” – a bogus public relations name for a process with few benefits for developing countries.   

Deals will likely be cut with limited concessions on drug patents and some tariff reductions (textiles is particularly senstitive) as a nod to developing countries.  However, the more profound economic agenda will  continue, meaning an increase in corporate control and a loss of democratic control over social and economic destinies. Since Seattle, the US and Europe seem to have agreed to not let their differences get in the way of a deal.  The US is not pushing on biotechnology, meaning there will be some corresponding trade-off expected from Europe.   

The good news of the day was that Chile has replaced Canada as chair of the committee working on environmental issues.  Chilean head of delegation Heraldo Munoz is much more likely to really consider environmental protection than was his Canadian counterpart.   Canada is now chairing discussions on investment and other issues, which also have important social and environmental implications. Behind the scenes, we are given to understand that it was pressure from Greenpeace that led to Canada being pulled from the environmental portfolio. The committees dealing with controversial issues meet briefly in closed sessions.  Most of their real work is done in smaller one-on-one meetings that are totally secret.  

Among many other visitors, Rubens Ricupero, head of United Nations Conference on Trade and Development visited the ship to express his support for environmental isues.  Mr Ricupero was in Doha for only about 12 hours and managed to visit the RW on his way back to the airport.  

Radio No New Round added to its web broadcasts by starting to broadcast on FM radio. This can be heard by anyone  in the area with an ordinary radio set on 89.6 FM.  While not exactly legal, this situation has so far been tolerated by the Qatari authorities – although they have re-attached the machine guns to their mounts on the patrol boats cruising by!  Remember you can hear us on the web worldwide at www.greenpeace.org or www.indymedia.org  Sunday at 3pm local time, we'll be broadcasting live to FM (and later to web radio) from the bridge of the RW, as Pascal Lamy and many NGOs come aboard the ship.

VISIT THE CYBERCENTRE

Please don't forget to visit the Greenpeace Cyberactivist Community at:
http://act.greenpeace.org


from Rainforest Action Network November 9, 2001

In this Post :
1. An exciting Week : 60 demos and a Big Victory!
2. RAN News Analysis : Historic Precedent Set by Dutch Banks
3. Focus on Finance News Story : Dutch Banks Commit to Forest Conservation
4. Action around the Country!

* * * * * * *
#1

This was an exciting week in the campaign to transform the investments of
mega-banks like Citigroup away from destructive activities that threaten the
environment and human rights.  On Nov 7th in over 60 communities and
campuses across the country people took action to confront Citigroup's role
in financing global warming, forest destruction and a host of other human
rights violations.  With actions ranging from credit card cut ups, to
consciousness raising tables, to demonstrations and symbolic deliveries
Citigroup got the message across the country that we will no longer tolerate
them funding destruction.
For a run down of the actions high lights from around the country check out
section #4 below.

Meanwhile on the other side of the Atlantic our allies scored a major
victory that will send ripples through the world of finance.   ABN AMRO, the
largest Dutch bank and a lead investor in fossil fuels and logging
operations, made an historic commitment to cease funding extractive
industries in primary and high conservation value forest ecosystems. This
pledge comes at the end of a campaign spearheaded by Milleudefense,
Greenpeace Netherlands, and Sawit Watch, a coalition of Indonesian NGOs. The
campaign targeted funding of projects that threaten Indonesia's primary
forests and also succeeded in getting two other Dutch banks, Rabobank and
Fortis bank to adopt a narrower set of policies to address the crisis in
Indonesia's forests. The ABN-AMRO's policy goes far beyond just Indonesia to
affect all extractive industries operating in forests around the planet.

Citigroup has claimed that they cannot adopt social and environmental
standards.  Citigroup has claimed they can't afford to divest from global
warming and forest destruction but the actions of these Dutch banks sets a
historical precedent that make it obvious how self-serving and myopic Citi
is acting.   Below is RAN's response to the announcement (#2) and an article
giving more details of the agreement (#3). This agreement is the first of
its kind and brings us one step closer to Citigroup eventual acceptance of
our movement's demands that they stop funding destruction.  As a top ABN
AMRO exec remarked "Companies that manage their environment poorly will
suffer financially. Clients and shareholders walk away, employees will seek
another boss”. To Citigroup CEO Sandy Weill we say : "pay attention, your
next!"

* * * * * * *
#2

RAINFOREST ACTION NETWORK NEWS ANALYSIS: HISTORIC PRECEDENT SET BY DUTCH
BANK

GROUPS CALL UPON AMERICAN BANKS TO FOLLOW SUIT

11/09/01…In a major step toward shifting the world’s financial sector to
ecological sustainability, Dutch Bank ABM AMRO has announced it will stop or
substantially restrict the financing of extractive industries in primary
forests. Two other Dutch Banks, Fortis Bank and Rabobank, have instituted
more narrow policies in response to growing concerns about the destructive
effects of the development of palm oil plantations. The policy addresses all
industries that destroy tropical rainforests, increase the risk of
large-scale forest fires and devastate local communities. This victory sets
a new standard that makes it unacceptable to do business with corporations
that destroy forests or threaten their traditional inhabitants. This is part
of a growing trend among consumers who are demanding that companies address
the social and environmental impacts of their business practices. A recent
Los Angeles Times poll shows that 9 out of 10 American’s support
preservation of remaining wilderness and consumer pressure has recently
forced hundreds of major companies around the world, including the UK’s B&Q,
the Netherlands’ Intergamma, and U.S. home improvement retailer Home Depot,
to commit to phase out the sale of wood coming from endangered forests.

Current campaigns in the United States call upon American financial
institutions to institute similar policies. Because of the leading role
these institutions play in the global economy, such commitments are
necessary to address the alarming rate of destruction of the world’s
forests. As North America’s largest financial institution, Citigroup has a
unique responsibility to lead the U.S. financial sector toward socially and
environmentally beneficial economics. Citigroup, whose Citibank and Salomon
Smith Barney units operate in 102 countries, is among the biggest financial
backers of destructive industries. According to Bloomberg analytics,
Citigroup was the No. 1 financier of oil pipelines and the coal industry in
2000, as measured by loans and corporate bond underwriting, and was No. 2 in
mining, forest and paper products. Citigroup has also financed the
conversion of millions of acres of primary rainforest into palm oil
plantations.

Instituting policies similar to those adopted by the Dutch Banks would halt
Citigroup’s key destructive projects, including the Camisea Gas Project in
Peru, the OCP Pipeline in Ecuador and the Chad-Cameroon Pipeline in Central
Africa, all of which are currently destroying pristine ecosystems and
displacing thousands of indigenous peoples.

"This exciting victory shows that the financial sector can and must take
responsibility for the role it plays in the crisis occurring in the world’s
forests," said Ilyse Hogue, Global Finance Campaigner with Rainforest Action
Network. "Citigroup is in the position to set acceptable environmental
standards for U.S. financial institutions. Capital investment is the fuel
that enables destructive activities to continue unabated and Citigroup
customers are speaking out to tell Citi, ‘Not with my money.’"

Rainforests cover less than 5 percent of the earth’s surface, yet they are
home to nearly half the world’s species. Rainforests store extensive amounts
of carbon and are therefore critical to moderating the effects of climate
change. Rainforests are home to more than 200 million indigenous people
worldwide. Less than 20% of the world’s old growth forests remain intact.

* * * * * * *
#3

Focus on Finance News
Special issue, November 2001

DUTCH BANKS COMMIT TO FOREST CONSERVATION

Three of the Dutch top-four banks - ABN AMRO Bank, Rabobank and Fortis
Bank - have decided to stop or substantially restrict the financing of the
development of oil palm plantations for which purposely tropical rainforest
is destroyed. This is the result of a joint campaign by Sawit Watch
Indonesia, Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands) and Greenpeace
Netherlands.

The 1997/98, 10 million hectares of forestland were burned in Indonesia. The
haze that covered the continent for several months affected the health of
some 70 million people in Southeast Asia. Rather than calling for greater
fire fighting capacity in Indonesia, environmental NGOs sought a fundamental
solution to combat the fires. The NGOs went after the financial backers of
the oil palm plantation industry in Indonesia, the sector that was widely
held accountable for causing the forest fires.

All major Dutch banks have financial ties with several of the main
plantation company groups in Indonesia and these banks are frequently in a
solid position to influence the environmental policies of their clients. In
a series of meetings and actions that started last January, Greenpeace
Netherlands and Friends of the Earth Netherlands demanded that the banks
adopt sustainability criteria for investments in the oil palm sector.

Last October 31, ABN-Amro Bank, Rabobank and Fortis Bank declared that they
subscribe to the investment criteria as put forward by the NGOs. Oil palm
plantation companies submitting investment proposals to these banks should:

1. Not be involved in burning forestland
2. Not be clearing tropical rainforest
3. Respect the rights and wishes of local communities
4. Respect Indonesia's law and relevant international conventions.

The decision of the banks is a landmark break-through in NGO efforts to
engage business in forest conservation and management. It is comparable to
the decision of the major Do-It-Yourself chains such as B&Q (UK), Intergamma
(Netherlands) and Home Depot (USA) to phase out the sales of non-certified
lumber. The decision of the banks is also timely, as many experts believe
that the drought of El Niño and subsequent forest fires will hit Indonesia
again in 2002.

Sawit Watch, the Indonesian NGO-network that is campaigning against
large-scale expansion of oil palm plantations, called upon all banks in the
world, including Indonesian banks, to follow the steps taken by the Dutch
banks. Sawit Watch’ policy researcher Joko Waluyo stated: "the investment
criteria not only guarantee the safety of bank credits, even more important
is the conservation of Indonesia's forests."

The campaign is already beginning to spread to other European countries,
where environmental and conservation groups approach investors and importers
to justify their involvement in plantation companies. Indonesia's pulp and
paper companies such as Asia Pulp & Paper (APP) and Riau Andalan Pulp and
Paper (PT RAPP) are already high on the agendas of NGOs in Switzerland and
the United Kingdom.

Of the Dutch banks that have committed to new investment policies, ABN Amro
Bank developed the most far-reaching policy. Its policy applies to all
sectors that might affect forests, including logging, pulp and paper, mining
and oil & gas development. Mr. Herman Mulder, head of ABN Amro’s Risk
Management division believes that the new credit practise will be widely
adopted quickly. “Companies that manage their environment poorly will suffer
financially. Clients and shareholders walk away, employees will seek another
boss” he was quoted as saying in the Volkskrant.

ABN Amro will “no longer finance projects or operations, which will result
in resource extraction from, or the clearing of, either primary or High
Conservation Value forests”. The bank will consider exceptions only “where
extraction is part of a carefully planned, responsible national forest
management program or where the company is FSC certified for operations in
that forest.”

To avoid that plantation companies clear forests first and then apply for
credits, ABN Amro Bank will not invest in plantation projects in forestlands
that have been cleared less than 5 years ago. Rabobank maintains a 3-year
limit.

One of Rabobank’s key criteria is that “no financial assistance is given for
the development or operation of oil palm plantations if the related party is
directly or indirectly (within the context of a larger group) involved in
illegal logging and/or commercial logging of primary or High Conservation
Value forests in the area designated for the plantation”. Rabobank will “not
work with clients who do not meet its investment criteria. If a client
violates the criteria, the bank will discuss the situation and if
improvements are not made, the relationship will be reviewed (‘review’ =
possibly terminate).”

The NGOs have not yet come to an agreement with ING Bank. This bank is not
prepared to go beyond local government regulations. In the Belgian newspaper
De Morgen an ING representative was quoted today as saying: “Illegal logging
is not possible, but if forest clearing is government approved, we are still
prepared to finance.”

For further information see:
http://www.focusonfinance.org/Dutchbanks2.htm


* * * * * * *

#4
A Few Action Reports from Around the Country

Send us in accounts of your action and definitely send us any press clips or
video coverage you received.  RAN will insure that Citigroup doesn't miss a
single news article about the campaign.  It is essential that we document
all the actions going on around the country so please send in your clips and
brief reports to organize@ran.org.


Des Moines, Iowa

The heartland of the Hot n' Bothered Climate campaign rallied about 30
students from four Iowa schools, Grinnell, Iowa
State, Drake Simpson and Kirkwood Colleges to visit a Citifinancial.
Radical cheerleaders educated the public, a giant citi credit card was
snipped in half and the public was educated about Citi's role in funding
global warming.  They had such a good time at the first citi, that they
decided to visit another on the other side of town. The action received
favorable coverage from local TV news, radio and print.  Iowa once again
shows how much they rock!


New Haven, CT

Over 2 dozen students from Yale and folks from the local community gathered
on campus to rally against Citigroup.  Students symbolically cut up their
Citibank credit cards  in a spirited demo and educated the community about
the dangers of doing business with the world's most destructive bank.
Organizers received a tremendous response through e-mail about the
day of action due to postering around campus the night before.

Delaware, Ohio

Students from Wesleyan University organized a fantastic and lively demo
where 30 students and community members threw a “party”  to congratulate
Citi in their role as the most destructive bank and biggest global warmer.
Posters with slogans like  (Citibank locally=destruction globally)  engulfed
the branch as protest participants made their way into the lobby.
Streamers, a specially composed congratulatory song and a birthday cake were
presented to the Citifinancial branch manager.  The local paper, the
Delaware gazette was on hand to record the festivities as 300 credit card
applications were
dumped.  Congratulations Dave Tessier for all your hard work and amazing
organizing!

Philadelphia, PA

Students at Swarthmore College in Philadelphia collected over 200 signatures
on anti-Citigroup petitions and educated folks on campus about Citi’s
practices.


New York City,
Casey Sullivan and crew from Earthmatters and PEEL (People for Environmental
and Economic Liberation) organized a kick butt demo/interactive canvass
outside a Citibank branch in Manhattan.. Activists handed out 600 flyers AND
convinced 3 people to change banks and  2 people to cut up their credit
cards on the spot!  WOW!  The protest then moved to corporate headquarters
which was enlightened by a dancing Orangutan in front of their offices.
Documentary filmakers were on hand to record the demonstration.


Salem State College in Massachusetts
It only takes 1 person to make an impact! Korey Payne did his own action and
interviewed people to say a few words about Citigroup.  In all, about 15
people voiced their opinions and concerns about Citi’s appalling business
practices.  He then walked inside to give the tape but the branch refused
the tape. But this organizer doesn’t take no for an answer.  Korey returned
later after hours and put the video in their drop box!

SF, CA
About 25 people gathered to present Citigroup with a giant "#1 Global
Warmer" award.  Dancing suns and banners waived outside the brand new
downtown Citibank location as hundreds of flyers were handed out and rowdy
bullhorn bellowing educated the masses about Citi's involvement in
destructive projects around the world.  Speakers talked about Citi's Camisea
project in Peru which will threaten pristine rainforests and several
indigenous groups who live in voluntary isolation.  Additionally first hand
accounts of the resistance to the Citi funded OCP pipeline in Ecuador were
given as local activists pledged their commitment to support front line
struggles against oil development around the world.  Best of all the world
famous U-G-L-Y chant was successfully performed in a rousing if slightly
arrhythmic way.  In a sure sign that Citigroup was feeling the heat right up
to the highest levels the courtyard to their downtown office tower was
sealed off with instructions informing patrons of how to enter the building
through a security check at the side entrance.

College of Charleston in South Carolina
Liz Thompson also wins the individual action award for a solo presentation
at a Soloman Smith Barney.  Liz, an art major presented the glorious award
to an initially smiling staff.  As Liz went into her speech about Citigroup
being the world’s worst global warmer, the staff’s grins turned slightly
down. Hopefully the sun’s winking face and 14 rays, with "positive energy"
inscribed will turn those frowns upside down!

Connecticut College,
Some dedicated tablers spread the word about the campaign and got 120
students to sign the no business with Citigroup pledges.  With all that
education going on its just the beginning of great things.  Stay tuned.

Ithaca, NY
Students at Cornell convinced their University president to deliver a letter
of protest and supporting materials to Cornell alumni and Citigroup CEO
Sandy Weill.  Wow!  As a follow up on the day of action they visited the
local Solomon Smith Barney office and presented the manager with a giant
windmill to represent the potential for investments in renewable energy. the
activists flyered outside and made a great connection with the manager who
promised to take the letter and petition down to central office.

University of Chicago,
Students organizing to cancel their University's contract with Citigroup
took a very exciting direct action.  They called citigroup to invite them to
send a representative out to debate representatives from RAN and
anti-predatory lending groups  to help the administration decide whether or
not to continue doing business with the world's most destructive bank.
We'll see if they take the UC students up on the offer.

Washington, D.C.
Rabble rousers from Powershift, Free the Planet and the local activist
community made a tour of several downtown Citibank branches in an effort to
find a manager who would accept their gift of a fry pan to help Citi
continuing frying the planet with their investments in global warming
industries.

Colgate, upstate NY
Students from Colgate visited their local Citifinacial branch in the
mid-afternoon to flyer the customers and engage the manager is discussion
about Citi's investments.  The truth hurt Citi so bad that the manager shut
down the branch for the remainder of the day and turn away numerous
customers.


All that and much more!  Reports are still rolling in of lots of courageous
and creative actions to stand up to the world's most destructive bank.  Let
us know what you did in your community - whether its was just you or you and
one hundred of your closest friends.


from Care2 alerts November , 2001

November 12, 2001

Care2's alerts newsletter features important steps YOU
can quickly take to help make the world greener and safer.
Today we offer you a special look at three critical
petitions, all of which need your attention--available at
ThePetitionSite.com. Act Now, It's FREE!

I. CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL PETITIONS: Now is the time to act
to save our planet for future generations. Here
are some key petitions on pressing environmental issues:

1) Will the Buffalo Have a Home? Save Our Last Wild
Grasslands!
Today, more than 90% of our native prairies have been
lost. Even within the National Grasslands, our prairies
have been breached by mining, road-building, and oil and
gas drilling. We cannot allow continued destruction of
this national treasure!
Click here to save the American grasslands, It's Free:
http://www.care2.com/go/redirect/2/2601
Deadline December 27, 2001

2) Demand reduced pollution from Southern utility
companies: "Clean Up Southern Company"!
You don't have to be a doctor to know that dirty air
isn't healthy. Each day Southern Company's power plants
across the country emit harmful pollutants that trigger
hundreds of thousands of asthma attacks and send
thousands of American to the hospital each year.
Isn't it time that Southern Company
cleaned up its act?
http://www.care2.com/go/redirect/2/2600

3) Save the Missouri River!
Did you know that one of our nation's most famous
rivers, the Missouri River, is in trouble? To save the
Missouri River, tell the Army Corps of Engineers and the
Bush administration to restore the Mighty Mo's heartbeat
and save the river's fish and wildlife.
Deadline December 22, 2001
http://www.care2.com/go/redirect/2/2602

More petitions: http://www.care2.com/go/redirect/2/2629

II. ACTIVIST TIPS
** Don't bother with "paper or plastic" at the grocery
store. Bring your own shopping bag to the grocery store
and eliminate waste to begin with!

** Compost your food waste. You'll decrease your total
garbage and the landfill space you take up while creating
nutrients for your favorite plants.

III. INSPIRATIONAL QUOTE
"Man has been endowed with reason, with the power to
create, so that he can add to what's been given. But up to
now he hasn't been a creator, only a destroyer. Forests keep
disappearing, rivers dry up, wild life's become extinct, the
climate's ruined and the land grows poorer and uglier every
day."
-Anton Chekhov (1860-1904), Uncle Vanya, 1897


~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

"We might be able to survive in a world where the giant
panda, the California Condor, and the black rhino exist
only as pictures in a book. But do we want to?"

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*


from American Lands November 13, 2001

To:     All Activists
From:   Lyndy Worsham, American Lands Alliance and Andrew George,
        National Forest Protection Alliance
Date:   November 12, 2001

Call-In Day for the "International Day of Action Against Staples" is
November 13, 2001!

The International Day of Action against Staples, is tomorrow November
13, 2001.  Please call Mr. Ron Sargent, Staples CEO, and tell him to
stop procuring wood fiber from U.S. public lands!

Making paper from ancient forests, U.S. public lands, and other
endangered forests ecosystems to make paper to be used once and thrown
away is unacceptable.  Raise your concerns today! Call 508.253.8955,
press 0 for the operator and ask to speak with Ron Sargent.  Or go to
http://www.staples.com/about/store/find/ to get the number for the
Staples nearest you, then call and speak with the manager.    

Tell them that Staples, as the largest and fastest growing office supply

company in the world, has a responsibility to stop destroying endangered

forests.  They should:

* Immediately phase out of all wood and paper products made from old
growth fiber.
* Immediately phase out of all wood and paper products made from fiber
from U.S. public lands.
* Set a target of 50% post consumer content for all paper products and
begin an immediate phase out of all products that are 100% virgin wood
fiber.
* Make available 100% post consumer paper and paper that is made from
agricultural fiber in all stores or other points of sale.
* Educate all employees, customers, and suppliers on the benefits of
recycled paper, recycling, the availability of alternative fibers, and
the benefits of healthy forest resources.

For more information contact: Lyndy Worsham, American Lands Southeast
Organizer, 828.251.9500 (phone), lyndy@americanlands.org.


from World Wildlife November 13, 2001

We urgently need your help again.  Within days, some U.S. senators may
try to add Arctic drilling and an abysmally bad House-passed energy
package to legislation intended to boost the U.S. economy.  PLEASE
FOLLOW THE SIMPLE STEPS BELOW TO SEND A FREE MESSAGE URGING YOUR
SENATORS TO OPPOSE THESE EFFORTS.  For background information, see the
very end of this message.

**********************TAKE ACTION NOW!****************

To send the message below as is to your senators, hit "reply" to this
email and then "send."  We will fill in the names and addresses and
automatically send the messages for you.

However, we urge you to greatly increase your impact by adding your
own thoughts to your message.  Personalizing your message only takes a
minute; see below for details.

ADD YOUR OWN THOUGHTS AND INCREASE YOUR IMPACT  

Log in to your Personal Action Center --
http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org/login.asp -- with your email
address (alerts@earthhopenetwork.net) and your password.  (If you have
forgotten your password, follow the instructions on the log-in page to
have a new password emailed to you.)

Once you are in your Personal Action Center, click on "Urgent:  
Another Arctic Refuge Threat" and follow the instructions for adding
your own thoughts to your messages.  

HELP BUILD THE POWER OF THE CONSERVATION ACTION NETWORK

Please urge your friends and family to become part of our winning
team.  They can check out the results and many victories of past
campaigns at http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org/results/    Forward
this email to your friends and colleagues and encourage them to join
the Conservation Action Network by visiting
http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org/

Thanks for helping to leave our children a living planet.

*********************LETTER TEXT******************

Dear Senator __________:

I urge you to oppose efforts to add energy legislation and Arctic
Refuge drilling provisions to the economic stimulus package (H.R.
3090).  Energy legislation is unrelated and an inappropriate
distraction from the economic stimulus debate.  A careful debate on
energy legislation and the Arctic Refuge should occur in a separate
forum.

House energy bill H.R. 4, which some are threatening to attach to the
stimulus package, has numerous flaws. It tilts heavily toward the
increased production of fossil fuels, while giving only minimal
attention to renewable energy and energy efficiency.  Simply
increasing production, at the expense of the Arctic Refuge and other
wilderness areas and wildlife we all cherish, will not buy America
energy security-in either the short or the long run.

As a nation, we hold only 3 percent of the world's reserves of oil,
yet we consume almost 25 percent of the world's daily production.  As
long as this is the case, we will remain dependent on world oil
markets, and we will pay the world price for oil, whether it is
produced domestically or abroad.  The safest and fastest way to
increase our energy security is to improve the energy efficiency of
our cars, trucks, homes, factories, and offices, and to increase the
role of renewable non-petroleum sources of energy in our economy.

I urge you to consider carefully the long-term implications of these
energy policy issues as part of an orderly process of the
consideration of energy matters, not as part of the economic stimulus
debate.

Sincerely,

Your name and address
will be inserted here

***********************END OF LETTER TEXT*********************

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

The attempt to add Arctic drilling to the economic stimulus package is
the latest in a series of strategies by some members of Congress to
open up the refuge to oil development.  Such efforts are ill-timed.  
In this time of national need, the Congress should put aside unrelated
and divisive issues and focus on strengthening our national security
and protecting the safety of all Americans.  

H.R. 4, the energy legislation that some senators are rushing to
Senate approval, is a complex package that has not yet been considered
by the appropriate committees in that body.  It was approved in the
House earlier in the summer.  The need for an economic stimulus, in
response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, should not be used
to prematurely cut off debate on the many difficult policy issues
raised by energy legislation that has not yet been considered by the
appropriate committees of the Senate.  

As a nation, we hold only 3 percent of the world's reserves of oil,
yet we consume almost 25 percent of the world's daily production.  As
long as this is the case, we will remain dependent on world oil
markets, and we will pay the world price for oil, whether it is
produced domestically or abroad.  The safest and fastest way to
increase our energy security is to improve the energy efficiency of
our cars, trucks, homes, factories, and offices, and to increase the
role of renewable non-petroleum sources of energy in our economy.

A recent World Wildlife Fund study indicated that energy efficiency
policies and development of renewable energy resources could result in
750,000 new jobs nationwide over the next nine years and 1.3 million
new jobs by 2020.  The study shows that these policies also create
more jobs and offer greater economic benefits than can be generated by
drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, despite the
unsubstantiated claims of drilling proponents.

Often called "America's Serengeti" because of its abundant caribou,
polar bear, grizzly bear, wolf, and other wildlife populations, the
coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge represents the
last 5 percent of America's Arctic not already open to development.  
Oil drilling would transform this ecological treasure trove into a
vast oil field with roads, pipelines, sewage plants, drilling pads,
and housing for thousands of workers.  

Last month, WWF Conservation Action Network activists helped fend off
a threat to the Arctic Refuge when the Senate voted 100-0 to stop an
effort to attach the energy legislation and Arctic Refuge drilling to
the Defense Authorization bill.

We greatly appreciate your continued support.  Please act now.

______________________________________________________________________
Direct any questions about the WWF Conservation Action Network to
actionquestions@takeaction.worldwildlife.org
______________________________________________________________________
The Conservation Action Network is sponsored by World Wildlife Fund-
US.  Known worldwide by its panda logo, WWF is dedicated to
protecting the world's wildlife and the rich biological diversity
that we all need to survive.  The leading privately supported
international conservation organization in the world, WWF has
sponsored more than 2,000 projects in 116 countries and has more than
1 million members in the United States.  WWF calls on everyone --
government, industry, and individuals -- to take responsibility by
taking action to save our living planet.

World Wildlife Fund
1250 Twenty-fourth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20037
http://www.worldwildlife.org
http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org


from World Wildlife November 14, 2001

Last year, WWF Conservation Action Network activists pushed for
protection of the globally outstanding Siskiyou Wild Rivers area of
Oregon.  (Thanks!)  Now, the area is under threat and we need your
help again.  PLEASE FOLLOW THE SIMPLE STEPS BELOW TO SEND A FREE
MESSAGE URGING THE CHIEF OF THE U.S. FOREST SERVICE NOT TO WEAKEN
PROTECTIONS AGAINST THE RAVAGES OF MINING ON MORE THAN 700,000 ACRES
OF THE AREA.  For background information, see the very end of this
message.

**********************TAKE ACTION NOW!****************

To send the message below, as is, to the chief of the Forest Service,
hit "reply" to this email and then "send."  We will fill in the names
and addresses and automatically send the messages for you.

However, we urge you to greatly increase your impact by adding your
own thoughts to your message.  Personalizing your message only takes a
minute; see below for details.

ADD YOUR OWN THOUGHTS AND INCREASE YOUR IMPACT  

Log in to your Personal Action Center --
http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org/login.asp -- with your email
address (alerts@earthhopenetwork.net) and your password.  (If you have
forgotten your password, follow the instructions on the log-in page to
have a new password emailed to you.)

Once you are in your Personal Action Center, click on "Mining
Threatens Globally Outstanding Ecoregion" and follow the instructions
for adding your own thoughts to your messages.  

HELP BUILD THE POWER OF THE CONSERVATION ACTION NETWORK

Encourage your friends and family to enroll in the Conservation Action
Network by visiting http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org/  

In addition to fighting for the Siskiyou Wild Rivers area,
they can push for no drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge,
the release of a much-needed management plan for a new national
monument, and the creation of more protected zones within the Great
Barrier Reef in Australia.

Thanks for helping to leave our children a living planet.

*********************LETTER TEXT******************

Dear Forest Service Chief Bosworth:

I urge you to support the proposal by former Interior Secretary Bruce
Babbitt to restrict mining in a portion of the Siskiyou Wild Rivers
area.  The purpose of the proposal was to protect the high ecological
and biological values of the area while the government and the public
determine if the area should be given special management designation.
The restrictions would mitigate the impacts of mining, which is one
of several serious threats facing the region's remarkable array of
wild and scenic rivers, valuable salmon and steelhead habitat, varied
geological features, and plant diversity.  

If the proposal is terminated, as you have requested, it would deprive
the public of an important opportunity for open debate on the future
of the Siskiyou Wild Rivers area and a comprehensive study of its
mineral and non-mineral values.  

In order to protect the outstanding values of the Siskiyou Wild Rivers
area, mining restrictions must be imposed in the following areas at
the very least:  Rough and Ready Creek Watershed and the South
Kalmiopsis Roadless Area; all botanical and research natural areas;
all key watersheds; all critical coho habitat and wild steelhead
habitat; the watersheds of all national wild and scenic rivers and
streams eligible to become wild and scenic rivers; and all rare and
sensitive plant habitat, including all serpentine fens.

A large contingent of the public and many political and opinion
leaders from throughout the country support the mining restrictions
and designating the Siskiyou Wild Rivers area as a national monument.
This world-class region needs restrictions on mining while a careful
public discussion of other possible protections is under way.

Sincerely,

Your name and address
will be inserted here

***********************END OF LETTER TEXT*********************

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Last year, WWF Conservation Action Network activists urged President
Clinton to designate the Siskiyou Wild Rivers area as a national
monument.  While President Clinton did not do so, his secretary of the
interior did propose that mining restrictions be imposed for the bulk
of the 1 million-acre area, which he said is probably "the most
biologically significant unprotected landscape in the American West."
His purpose in proposing the restrictions was to protect the high
ecological and biological values of the area while the government and
the public determine if the area should be given special management
status.  

The restrictions would prevent the filing of new mining claims, damage
from prospecting activities, and destructive marginal mining
operations on existing claims throughout more than 700,000 acres.  
Mining is one of a number of serious threats facing the region's
remarkable array of wild and scenic rivers, valuable salmon and
steelhead habitat, varied geological features, and plant diversity.  

Recently, however, President Bush's chief of the U.S. Forest Service
has bucked the tide of public opinion by requesting that the proposed
mining restrictions and the two-year public process analyzing the
proposal be terminated.  The forest service chief indicated that he
will instead recommend restrictions on a much smaller area, possibly
encompassing only 6 percent of the original area, leaving vulnerable
many important botanical and salmon spawning areas.

Although the secretary of the interior has the ultimate authority to
make, modify, or revoke the mining restrictions (known as a mineral
withdrawal), she cannot act without the consent of the forest service
chief.  Therefore, his requested termination, if it stands, will
deprive the public of an important opportunity for open debate on the
future of the Siskiyou Wild Rivers area and a comprehensive study of
its mineral and non-mineral values.

Please act now.
______________________________________________________________________
Direct any questions about the WWF Conservation Action Network to
actionquestions@takeaction.worldwildlife.org
______________________________________________________________________
The Conservation Action Network is sponsored by World Wildlife Fund-
US.  Known worldwide by its panda logo, WWF is dedicated to
protecting the world's wildlife and the rich biological diversity
that we all need to survive.  The leading privately supported
international conservation organization in the world, WWF has
sponsored more than 2,000 projects in 116 countries and has more than
1 million members in the United States.  WWF calls on everyone --
government, industry, and individuals -- to take responsibility by
taking action to save our living planet.

World Wildlife Fund
1250 Twenty-fourth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20037
http://www.worldwildlife.org
http://takeaction.worldwildlife.org


from American Oceans Campaign November 14, 2001

American Oceans Campaign is pleased to report that
Congress approved $10 million in federal assistance
to coastal, bay and Great Lakes states for beach water
quality monitoring programs! The funds will be distributed
to eligible states by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA), as authorized by the Beaches Environmental
Assessment and Coastal Health (BEACH) Act. Your support
has been key in getting the BEACH bill passed into
law last year and recently, asking Congress to provide
coastal states with the federal funds they need to
develop and improve their beach water quality monitoring
programs. American Oceans Campaign activists have responded
to numerous action alerts on this issue, sending faxes
to Senators and Congressional Representatives urging
them to pass this important legislation and provide
the BEACH Act with adequate funding. Thank you for
voicing your support for clean beach water and healthy
oceans.

The Bush administration will accept a new, tougher
arsenic standard for drinking water that was issued
in the last days of the Clinton presidency. The decision
will reduce the maximum of arsenic allowed in drinking
water from 50 parts per billion - a level first set
in 1942 - to 10 parts per billion by 2006. This decision
is a victory for the health of American families. Thank
you to all the AOC activists who sent e-mails and faxes
to EPA Administrator Whitman urging the EPA to continue
with the implementation of stronger drinking water
standards to protect your drinking water from arsenic,
our voices were heard!


from American Lands November 14, 2001

TO: All Activists
FR: Francis Eatherington, Umpqua Watersheds and George Sexton,      
American Lands
DATE: November 14, 2001

COMMENTS NEEDED:  HELP STOP OLD GROWTH AND ROADLESS AREA LOGGING ON THE
UMPQUA NATIONAL FOREST

The Umpqua National Forest is inviting you to comment (through November
26) on the dreaded Lemolo Timber Sale environmental impacts (EIS). The
Forest Service first threatened to log these spectacular ancient forests
in the Diamond Lake Ranger District in 1999.  Since then over 200 people
have signed petitions and submitted scoping comments asking for these
forests to be spared.  In spite of the huge public opposition, the
"preferred alternative" is to build 7.5 miles of new logging roads to
haul away 5,700 log truck loads (28.34 mmbf) of old-growth and native
forests from 1,619 acres, including converting (clearcutting) 450 acres
to new tree plantations for the timber industry to farm.

The Lemolo sale will degrade the forests in the roadless Oregon Cascade
Recreation Area (OCRA) and the RARE II Thirsty Point roadless area,
attached to Mt. Thielsen Wilderness.  Logging is proposed inside the
natural (not political) roadless boundaries of the OCRA(designated in
the 1984 wilderness bill as a roadless area, set aside for wildlife and
recreation).  The Lemolo timber sale will clearcut on Kelsay Point, a
peninsula protruding into the inventoried roadless boundary. With
Wilderness on three sides, the entire peninsula will be roaded and
logged.  The integrity of the designated Wilderness will be severely
compromised instead of preserved for the Wolverine and Lynx populations
that live close by.

Near the OCRA are some of the best roadless areas over 1,000 acres left
in the Umpqua -- now threatened with logging.  One area above the Kelsay
Valley Campground and the Wilderness Trailheads is a large 2,000-acre
roadless area separated from the OCRA by only one summer-time road.  
Lemolo Timber Sale will log immediately next to the campground, log
about 25% of the roadless area, and riddle the mountainside with new
permanent roads and clearcuts.

Other roadless areas threatened are Kelsay Valley where new roads and
clearcutting will occur up to the edge of the beautiful Spring River
Special Area, and Bunker Hill where logging will occur within plain view
of the Lemolo Lake Lodge. Even though hundreds of comments to the
district asked them to protect the roadless areas from the Lemolo sale,
the word "roadless" isn't even in the EIS. They just don't care.

The Diamond Lake Ranger District's old-growth forests and high cascade
lakes attract the largest recreation use and the rarest wildlife and
plants on the entire Umpqua National Forest.  In spite of this, it is
the sacrificial logging ground to get the cut out. Since 1995 the
District has sold, or plans to sell, 9306 acres of wild, native, and
old-growth forests, converting many to perpetual tree farms to benefit
only the timber industry.  The 9,306 acres would produce 3,928 million
board of timber that will fit on about 47,183 log trucks. If these log
trucks were lined up on Interstate 5, they would stretch from Roseburg
to Seattle (357 miles if the trucks are 40 feet long).  This is in
addition to the unfathomable acres of clearcuts existing prior to 1995.  
The District plans to finish logging all their available old-growth
within 50 years.

Please tell the Umpqua National Forest it's time to stop.  The public
will simply not allow this to continue on our forests.  The Umpqua NF
should choose Alternative 1, No Action, in the Lemolo Timber Sale EIS.

Write to Diamond Lake District Ranger John Ouimet at jouimet@fs.fed.us
(please include your street address on email comments), call in comments
at 541-498-2531 or fax comments to 541-498-2515.  Postal mail address is
2020 Toketee Ranger Station Road, Idleyld Park, Oregon, 97447 (please
put a return address outside postal mail envelopes).

For more information and pictures of the beautiful and threatened
forests, see our web site at:
http://www.umpqua-watersheds.org/unf/lemolo.html.  The Umpqua National
Forest has the Lemolo Timber Sale EIS on-line at:
http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/umpqua/planning/ea_eis/lemolo_watershed_abstract.html


Contact Francis Eatherington at francis@wizzards.net or George Sexton at
wafc@teleport.com for additional questions


from Defenders of Wildlife November 14, 2001

MAKING YOUR VOICES HEARD: Redford delivers 'save-the-Arctic' petitions
THREAT TO ARCTIC REFUGE: BP admits safety problems plague Prudhoe Bay
RECIPE FOR EXTINCTION: Feds may yank protections from Florida manatees
SCIENTIFIC VERDICT: Biologists criticize Canada's species bill
ALARMING DISCOVERY: Scientists worry over decline of sea otters in Alaska
RESTORING FERRETS: Defenders commends BLM for releasing rare mammals
HOLIDAY GIFT CENTER: Just in time for your shopping


1. MAKING YOUR VOICES HEARD: Redford delivers 'save-the-Arctic' petitions

Actor and conservationist Robert Redford went to Capitol Hill today to deliver more than two million petitions from the Natural Resources Defense Council and Defenders of Wildlife urging President Bush and Congress not to allow oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge – America's greatest wildlife sanctuary. Defenders' 1.2 million petitions, generated at the web site http://www.Savearcticrefuge.org, asked Bush and Congress "to save wild places like the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for future generations." Big Oil and its allies are making a major push now to change the law that protects the refuge. Despite criticism that they are exploiting our national crisis, they are threatening to tack their pro-drilling provision onto important legislation in the Senate to help revive America's economy. The Senate could vote this week, and the outcome is too close to call.

2. THREAT TO ARCTIC REFUGE: BP admits safety problems plague Prudhoe Bay

The British oil giant BP has admitted widespread operational problems at its oil field at Alaska's Prudhoe Bay next to the Arctic refuge. A BP team of employees and consultants "found deficiencies ranging from a lack of maintenance on safety equipment to reports of chronic valve leaks," the Wall Street Journal reported. The team, which conducted its review over the summer after the JournalPolar Bear

WHAT YOU CAN DO: Share this issue of DENlines with a friend. And take action yourself by going to http://www.savearcticrefuge.org

For daily updates on the Arctic refuge and other issues, check our Web site at http://www.defenders.org

Our Joel Bennett has just returned from the refuge where he filmed polar bears. Click here to watch his exclusive, first-hand report: http://www.defenders.org/wildlife/polarvideo.html

3. RECIPE FOR EXTINCTION: Feds may yank protections from Florida manatees

The Fish and Wildlife Service has unveiled a plan that would strip protections from Florida manatees and leave them more vulnerable to reckless pleasure boaters. Officials said they will consider taking manatees off the endangered species list in 2003, even if the species shows zero population growth. That's against the recommendation of the agency's panel of science advisors. They said the reclassification would greatly harm manatees. The Florida Today newspaper called the reclassification plan "a wrong-headed approach that must be prevented. The creatures have been federally protected for three decades under a legal umbrella that has saved them from extinction, and removing that umbrella could result in disaster." So far this year, 276 manatees have died – 67 of them from being hit by speeding boats. You can help by sharing this issue of DENlines with your friends and by visiting http://www.defenders.org.

4. SCIENTIFIC VERDICT: Biologists criticize Canada's species bill

More than 1,300 of the world's top biologists criticized Canada's proposed endangered species legislation in a letter to Prime Minister Jean Chretien. The bill, which is being hotly debated in the Canadian parliament, doesn't mandate protection for the habitats of endangered species, and the list of species would be picked by politicians, not scientists. In addition, citizens couldn't petition the government to protect species. Defenders of Wildlife is working to strengthen the legislation to save Canada's endangered species for future generations. Already, 352 species are at risk of disappearing, and dozens more become endangered every year. "Without effective protection," the scientists wrote in their letter, "many of these species will vanish from the wild or go extinct in our lifetimes, with potentially serious effects on the ecosystems on which human life depends."

5. ALARMING DISCOVERY: Scientists worry over decline of sea otters in Alaska

Federal wildlife officials discovered dramatic declines in the number of sea otters in southwest Alaska. Aerial surveys http://www.saveseaotters.org. To read the Fish and Wildlife Service's latest report on the decline of sea otters, click here. http://alaska.fws.gov/ea/sotter/declineotter.pdf.

6. RESTORING FERRETS: Defenders commends BLM for releasing rare mammals

After an absence of many decades, 20 highly endangered black-footed ferrets have been returned to public land in central Montana by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). It's part of a larger effort to restore a healthy population of these animals throughout the Great Plains. Ferrets once lived all over the Great Plains, wherever prairie dogs occurred, from Saskatchewan to Mexico, from the foothills of the Rockies to the Dakotas, Kansas, Nebraska and Oklahoma. But prairie dogs are 90 percent of the ferret's food, and prairie dogs were poisoned systematically beginning in the early 1990s. That decimated ferrets, too. "We are very encouraged that the BLM is taking the initiative and restoring America's most endangered land mammal to the prairies of Montana. This area is our greatest hope for reestablishing black-footed ferrets," said Minette Johnson, Defenders of Wildlife's Northern Rockies field representative. "We have been working long and hard to get ferrets on the ground, and now it's finally happening."

7. HOLIDAY GIFT CENTER: Just in time for your shopping!

With the holidays fast approaching, you're no doubt looking for that perfect gift for a loved one. Here are a number of gifts through which you'll also be helping generate funds to save America's imperiled wildlife and habitat:

  • Adopt a wolf or another favorite animal. Give the gift of sponsorship and that person will receive a huggable animal toy, an adoption certificate and a year's subscription to our award-winning Defenders magazine. Click here to go to our Wildlife Adoption Center. http://www.defenders.org/adopt
  • Donate to save "Harry Potter's owl" and receive a plush, toy owl. Snowy owls – featured in the Harry Potter movie and books – are under threat from those who would drill in their sanctuaries. With your tax-deductible gift, you'll receive our toy snowy owl. http://www.saveowls.org.
  • Special discount on popular Defenders gear. Click here http://www.defendersgifts.org/den for special prices on clothing and items featuring wildlife, including photos from world-famous wolf photographer Jim Brandenburg.
  • Enter and bookmark our shopping portal to over 150 online stores (including Amazon.com), and these stores will make a contribution to Defenders at no additional cost to you. Click here: http://www.defenders.org/den/shop.html.

DENlines is a bi-weekly publication of Defenders of Wildlife, a leading national conservation organization recognized as one of the nation's most progressive advocates for wildlife and its habitat. It is known for its effective leadership on endangered species issues, particularly predators such as brown bears and gray wolves. Defenders also advocates new approaches to wildlife conservation that protect species before they become endangered. Founded in 1947, Defenders is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization with more than 400,000 members and supporters. To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to denlines@defenders.org and put the word UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.

Defenders of Wildlife
1101 14th Street, N.W.
Suite 1400
Washington, DC 20005

Copyright Defenders of Wildlife 2001


from Environmental Defense November 15, 2001

Environmental Defense Action Network News

November 2001

***************************  
Action Network from Environmental Defense.  
Finding the ways that work.  
***************************  

Welcome to our new and improved email from Environmental
Defense Action Network. We hope you'll find our success
stories, updates and new action alerts useful.

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
i. ACTION NETWORK AT WORK!  
-Brazilian Pipeline Construction Delayed
-Offshore Drilling Blocked
ii. TAKE ACTION NOW!  
-Keep Antibiotics Working
-Tell Senate to Help Farmers Help the Environment
iii. ECO-TIP!  
-Help Prevent Climate Change
iv. CHECK OUT SCORECARD!  
-Who is polluting in your neighborhood?
v. VISIT YOUR ACTION NETWORK WORKSPACE!  
-Update your address, take action, get updates, and
more.
////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

ACTION NETWORK AT WORK! SUCCESS STORIES AND UPDATES

Success! Plans for Amazon Pipeline Cracked!
Emails from nearly 2,000 activists help convince Brazilian
officials to delay destructive pipeline in the heart
of the Amazon rainforest. To find out how you helped
"crack" this controversial project, click here:
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/td1-AS11ucFo/pipeline

Fragile Coastal Waters Win Reprieve from Offshore Drilling
7,000 activists have sent letters to federal government
opposing offshore oil drilling. Their voices were heard!
To learn about the steps that Congress is taking, and
what this means for the future, click here:
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/5p1-AS11ucFk/offshore_drilling

CA Activists Help Rally Support as Legislature Passes
Parks Measure
California state legislature votes to put $2.6 billion
parks measure on the ballot after 2,000 activists in
California take action. Find out what this means for
California voters. Click here:
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/t11-AS11ucF9/CA_parks

TAKE ACTION NOW!

Help Keep Antibiotics Working  
Recent threats of bio-terrorism have highlighted how
important it is that we safeguard the effectiveness
of America's antibiotics supply. Contact Bayer and
ask them to help slow the spread of antibiotic-resistant
bacteria and extend the usefulness of antibiotics.
Take action at:  
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/antibiotics_envdef/wk8bxn2r78xbin  

Help Farmers Help the Environment. Onto the Senate!
Over 46,000 Environmental Defense Action Network members
have already taken action to support a Farm Bill Conservation
Amendment in the House. The Bill has now moved to the
Senate and we still need your help! Take action at:
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/farm_reform_senate2/wk8bxn2o78xbi5

Take the Clean Car Pledge...Online!
Take the Clean Car Pledge and Industry Challenge. Remind
U.S. car companies that consumers want cleaner car
choices. Take Action at:
http://actionnetwork.org/campaign/clean_car_pledge/wk8bxn4278xbmk

ECO-TIP

Help Prevent Climate Change
Run your dishwasher only with a full load. Use the
energy-saving setting to dry the dishes. Don't use
heat when drying. Carbon dioxide reduction: 200 pounds
a year. For more simple ways that you can help reduce
global warming, click here:
http://actionnetwork.org/ct/t71-AS11ucFl/climate_change

WHO IS POLLUTING IN YOUR COMMUNITY?
Scorecard
Visit Scorecard (http://actionnetwork.org/ct/tp1-AS11ucF0/scorecard)
and enter your zip code to find out what pollutants
are being released in your neighborhood, and who is
responsible.  


from Zero Population Growth November 15, 2001

Population and Environment  
Town Meetings and Media Events
Fall 2001  

On November 7 the State of World Population 2001 report,
Footprints and Milestones: Population and the Environmental
Change was released around the world.  

http://actionnetwork.org/ct/-7qUq8d1uc-S/ contains
copies of the full report and other background information.

Over the next few weeks in the United States there
will be at least 14 town meetings to discuss the report.
Listings of the town meetings are on http://actionnetwork.org/ct/-dqUq8d1uc-z/

Participate in a Population and Environment event in
your hometown:  

St. Petersburg, FL
November 15

Philadelphia, PA
November 27

Columbus, OH
November 28

Madison, WI
November 28  

San Francisco, CA
November 29

Oxford, OH
November 29

Ann-Arbor, MI
December 10

Albany, NY
February 4th

Providence, RI
February 2002

--------------------------------------------------

Visit the web address below and tell your friends about
this important issue!

http://actionnetwork.org/join-forward.html?domain=ZPG_Action_Network&r=i7qUq8d1uuFA


from EarthNet News November 15, 2001

EarthNet News
...a project of the Center for Environmental Citizenship

November 15, 2001  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This week in EarthNet, rev up your engines to curb
snowmobile and off-road vehicle pollution. Also, a
fellow EarthNet reader challenges the environmental
community to examine its convictions.

Special note:
I'm turning over the editing of EarthNet News to the
extremely capable Zachariah Silk. (Nope, that's not
an alias or a nom de plume -- he's just that cool.)
The last few months have been a crazy and challenging
time. But I've been moved and inspired by the fantastic
people who have written in and taken action. I've chosen
my fave Edward Abbey quote to sum up the experience
-- you'll find it as the quote o' the week. Long may
you continue to kick major booty!

--Susie Gorden, EarthNet Editor
mailto:earthnet@envirocitizen.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Shadow Congress: Abominable Snowmobiles (and ORVs)
2. Quote of the Week
3. Letter to the Editor  
4. Environmental Impacts of War: Nuclear Weapons
5. Glimmer of Hope
6. Jobs, Conferences and Gatherings
7. Activist Phone Book & EarthNet News Info

SHADOW CONGRESS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vroom, vroom. Air and noise pollution from snowmobiles,
dirt bikes, and all-terrain vehicles -- known collectively
as off-road vehicles (ORVs) -- is endangering many
of our most precious natural parks. In what enviros
hoped would be a step in the right direction, the US
Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) recently
proposed higher pollution standards for these vehicles.


But the proposal fails to address any other criteria
-- including a transition to cleaner four-stroke engines,
noise pollution reduction, and consumer labeling to
enable emission comparisons. Combined with pollution,
ORVs are causing serious physical damage to fragile
ecosystems. National parks are there for everyone to
enjoy. Let's do so responsibly, so that they're around
for a long time to come.

TAKE ACTION NOW: Tell the EPA to strengthen their ORV
proposal from the EarthNet Action Center at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet

FOR MORE INFO:  
http://www.wilderness.org/standbylands/orv/skidmarks_101901.htm#four;
http://www.edie.net/news/Archive/4712.cfm;
http://www.naturaltrails.org/alerts/01_12_19_epaengine.html

QUOTE OF THE WEEK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do not burn yourself out. Be as I am -- a reluctant
enthusiast ... a part-time crusader, a half-hearted
fanatic. Save the other half of yourselves and your
lives for pleasure and adventure. It is not enough
to fight for the land; it is even more important to
enjoy it. While you can. While it is still there. So
get out there and hunt and fish and mess around with
your friends, ramble out yonder and explore the forests,
encounter the grizz, climb the mountains, bag the peaks.
Run the rivers, breathe deep of that yet sweet and
lucid air, sit quietly for a while and contemplate
the precious stillness, that lovely, mysterious and
awesome space.  

Enjoy yourselves, keep your brain in your head and
your head firmly attached to the body, the body active
and alive, and I promise you this much: I promise you
this one sweet victory over our enemies, over those
deskbound people with their heart in a safe deposit
box and their eyes hypnotized by desk calculators.
I promise you this: You will outlive the bastards.
--Edward Abbey, author and activist

LETTER TO THE EDITOR
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Environmentalist movement has become, in many
cases, an unscientific, unthinking, and utterly impractical
movement. It becomes almost religious in its following,
and begins to lose sight of reason. Reason is the only
method by which those who oppose us can be convinced.
We can attempt to outgun them, but until we have reasonable
philosophical and scientific underpinnings, we are
doomed to failure. We don't have enough guns to outgun
them. My own view is that I am what I term a sentimental
environmentalist. I feel, without any claim to moral
superiority, that I need "the wild" in my life, using
a term from Muir. I also understand that the ecosystems
are undergoing tremendous changes. However, if one
were to ask a geologist whether he feels intellectually
that the loss of even an entire ecosystem will matter
in geologic time, he/she would probably deny it.  

As to the so-called wider issues: global warming, loss
of biodiversity, etc, I am reminded, and I apologize
for not being able to site the name, of the member
of GreenPeace who set out to prove the reality of the
disaster said to be threatening the world. He, after
detailed study, came to the opposite conclusions from
his environmental colleagues. And his statistics have
been tested, and withstood those tests. Personally,
I will continue to support preservation, but I also
give a call for intellectual honesty. Convictions,
even when they seem in the noblest cause, must be challenged.

--Daniel Sude

Got something to say? Send your letters to mailto:earthnet@envirocitizen.org
We reserve the right to edit for length, clarity, and
purpose.

GLIMMER OF HOPE
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last week, two prominent environmentalists were freed
in Mexico -- amid allegations that their confessions
were coerced and the charges against them were bogus.
Rodolfo Montiel and Teodoro Cabrera were the leaders
of protests against logging activities in the Sierra
Madre Mountain range prior to their arrest and subsequent
jailing on weapons and drugs charges in 1999. The case
received quite a bit of media attention and the activists
have been awarded numerous human rights and environmental
awards. To read more about the case,  
go to http://www.ens-news.com/ens/nov2001/2001L-11-08-03.html

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF WAR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One lone plane in the sky on August 6, 1945 is an image
ingrained forever in the minds of many people living
in Hiroshima -- as frightening, perhaps, as the image
of the passenger jet headed towards the World Trade
towers on September 11. For those who survived the
dropping of the "A-bomb," the image ushered in a new
era, one that was to redefine the limits of human and
environmental destruction.  

Yielding a power equivalent to about 15 kilotons of
TNT gunpowder, "little boy" -- as the uranium bomb
was dubbed -- wiped out buildings and homes in a matter
of seconds, killing thousands immediately and slowly
killing many more with radiation sickness for years
to come.  

What are the environmental consequences of "the nuclear
age?" Photographs of Hiroshima after the fact show
trees reduced to bare trunks: a sign of the destruction
that extended for miles under an enormous "death cloud."
Radioactive debris or "fallout" continued to fall from
the sky for weeks, leading scientists to speculate
that it would take 75 years before plants would grow.


The successive nuclear catastrophes on Three Mile Island
and in Chernobyl released radioactive material that
has damaged ecosystems throughout the northern hemisphere.
Modern nuclear "meltdowns" such as these show how nuclear
power presents a threat even in peace times. Unfortunately,
while nuclear power in the twentieth century remains
a risky, if not suicidal investment, it looks like
we still have a long way to go before anything will
be done.  

Nuclear power plants are also vulnerable to attack
from the air, a disturbing reality when we consider
that -- although nuclear power has been called a dying
industry -- reactors are still housed in 30 countries.
The United States itself houses 103 reactors.  

In response to September 11th's terrorist attacks,
the United Nations International Atomic Energy Agency
recently opened a special session to discuss the threat
of "nuclear terrorism." While many reactors in the
US have been put on high alert, scientists and environmentalists
are saying this is not enough and call for a complete
phase-out of nuclear power.

Many argue that the environmental cost of nuclear power
alone is enough reason to abolish its use -- that it
is not just weapons proliferation that poses a threat,
but the entire nuclear fuel cycle. From the mining
of uranium to the disposal of nuclear waste, this process
presents considerable environmental problems, including
air and water pollution. Many uranium mines have been
located near poor communities, exposing residents to
significant health risks. Charges of environmental
racism also haunt the storing of nuclear waste. Native
peoples living near Yucca Mountain in Nevada -- a proposed
storage site -- are fighting back.

The threat to our environment and to human health will
exist far into the future, since radioactive waste
remains hazardous for thousands of years. Will generations
to come be as vigilant in looking after our waste?
Is it a legacy we want to pass on?

FOR MORE INFORMATION: http://www.nirs.org;
http://fast.antenna.nl/wise/;
http://www.wagingpeace.org
--Leigh-Anne Havemann, CEC Intern, prepared this report.

Big thanks to both Leigh-Anne and Joycelyn Lee -- amazing
interns and even better people.

JOBS AND INTERNSHIPS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are a sampling of the over 200 environmental
and activist jobs and internships listed at www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/index.asp !

Power Shift is hiring Campaign Interns in Washington,
DC. Find the job description at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/detail.asp?id=3650

Green Corps is recruiting applicants for its Fellowship
Program. Find the job description at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/detail.asp?id=3648

The Marine Mammal Center seek a Development Associate
in Sausalito, CA. Find the job description at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/detail.asp?id=3636

CONFERENCES, GATHERINGS AND VIEWINGS  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lots more events listed at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/index.asp

WHAT: Boston Environmental History Seminar  
WHERE: Boston, MA
WHEN: December 11, 2001
FOR MORE INFO: http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/detail.asp?id=880

WHAT: Sustainable Communities: Science & Solutions
WHERE: Washington, DC
WHEN: December 6-7, 2001
FOR MORE INFO: http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/detail.asp?id=897

WHAT: People's Holiday: A Celebration of Art & Action
WHERE: Seattle, WA
WHEN: November 30, 2001
FOR MORE INFO: http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/detail.asp?id=992


ACTIVIST PHONE BOOK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Capitol Switchboard: 202.224.3121
White House Comment Line: 202.456.1111
EarthNet Action Center: http://congress.nw.dc.us/cec

White House Address: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington,
DC 20500
Senate Address: US Senate, Washington, DC 20510
House Address: US House of Representatives, Washington,
DC 20515
**Look up e-mail addresses in a comprehensive congressional
directory at
http://congress.nw.dc.us/cec/congdir.html or http://www.vote-smart.org/ce

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write your own short articles for submission to EarthNet.
We are particularly interested in articles about student
activism on your campus. The email accounts for EarthNet
News are:
For general comments: mailto:earthnet@envirocitizen.org
Submit Jobs/Internships/Volunteer listings at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/jobs/add.asp .
Submit Events at http://www.envirocitizen.org/enet/events/add.asp .

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe to our listserv, EarthNet News, go to
http://www.envirocitizen.org/subscribe.html , or send
an email to mailto:earthnet@envirocitizen.org with
the subject subscribe.

--------------------------------------------------

Does reading EarthNet News give you that warm, fuzzy
feeling? Well, share it with your friends and family.
They can sign up at http://www.envirocitizen.org/subscribe.html

http://actionnetwork.org/join-forward.html?domain=san&r=ddqAAaF1uuFs

If you received this message from a friend, you can
sign up for Student Action Network at:

http://actionnetwork.org/san/join.html?r=ddqAAaF1uuFsE


from American Civil Liberties Union November 15, 2001

TO: ACLU Action Network Members
FR: Jared Feuer, Internet Organizer
DT: November 15, 2001

1). Congress Must Assert Its Oversight Authority!

Earlier this week, President Bush issued an executive order that would allow special military tribunals to try non-citizens charged with terrorism. This action followed another Administration-issued regulation that gives the government the power to listen in on any conversation between a suspect and his attorney.

Both these measures threaten to essentially eviscerate key constitutional protections. Military tribunals would authorize secret trials without a jury and without the requirement of a unanimous verdict, even in situations where the defendant could face the death penalty. Furthermore, allowing the government to eavesdrop on any conversation would severely damage the right of defendants to receive adequate counsel.

Take Action! Due process must be protected. You can read more and send a FREE FAX, asking your Members of Congress to hold hearings to question the Administration's new policies at:

http://www.aclu.org/action/dueprocess107.html

2). Help the ACLU During These Difficult Days

Through your online activism you have demonstrated your commitment to protecting the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. And as you know, the American Civil Liberties Union plays an unmatched role in this constant struggle.

As an online activist, you also know that we are currently facing a major assault on our civil liberties after the tragic terrorist attacks on our nation in September. As we struggle to protect civil liberties in this time of crisis, a strong membership is one of the ACLU's most powerful tools.

That is why we need everyone who cares about protecting freedom to join us by becoming card-carrying members of the ACLU.

If you are not already an ACLU member, please consider clicking below to join right now:

http://www.aclu.org/action/join107.html

If you are already a member - thank you. Your support has never been more valuable.

You can help us even more by agreeing to forward this message to friends, family and colleagues who might share your belief that we must protect the freedoms guaranteed to each and every person in America by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Now more than ever, we need everyone who loves liberty to become members of the ACLU. Please help us find them by forwarding this message today!



top
environment & conservation activism & wildlife protection - Earthhope Action Network